2022
DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2709254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Trends in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Bibliometric and Network Visualization Study

Abstract: Background:The past decade has seen major advances in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve various biomedical problems, including cancer. This has resulted in more than 6000 scientific papers focusing on AI in oncology alone. The expansiveness of this research area presents a challenge to those seeking to understand how it has developed. A scientific analysis of AI in the oncology literature is therefore crucial for understanding its overall structure and development. This may be addressed through … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the data from the current literature [24], the most frequently reported uses of AI were related to imaging, particularly the interpretation and quantification of imaging findings (70.8% of respondents), texture analysis and computer-aided diagnosis (45.8%), and the grading of disease severity (37.5%). Likewise, when asked which area would most benefit most from AI implementation, most study participants would recommend AI for improving the accuracy of diagnoses (72%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with the data from the current literature [24], the most frequently reported uses of AI were related to imaging, particularly the interpretation and quantification of imaging findings (70.8% of respondents), texture analysis and computer-aided diagnosis (45.8%), and the grading of disease severity (37.5%). Likewise, when asked which area would most benefit most from AI implementation, most study participants would recommend AI for improving the accuracy of diagnoses (72%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This could suggest that AI remains a prerogative of the academic community and of younger generations that are more acquainted with digital technology. Among the 14 countries included, Northern European and Western countries had the highest prevalence of AI use, which may indicate a higher tendency for high-income countries to employ AI tools [21,[23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another finding is that many papers that I found relevant to the future of synthetic biology’s governance, risk, and innovation trajectory, did not in fact use that term. Dozens and dozens of papers included in the sample happily discussed AI and the impact on their field, be it metagenomics of the microbiome ( Wani et al, 2022 ), health and intelligent medicine ( Achim and Zhang, 2022 ), applied microbiology ( Xu et al, 2022 ), designer genes ( Hoffmann, 2023 ), drug discovery ( Yu et al, 2022 ), oncology ( Wu et al, 2022 ), systems biology ( Helmy et al, 2020 ) without realizing that synthetic biology is bound to intersect with it at some point soon (or at least explicitly omitting the use of the term). What could the reason be?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the most authoritative and comprehensive database platforms, the SCI-Expanded of Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) originates from Clarivate Analytics, which contains more than 12000 international academic journals ( Wu et al, 2022b ). Consequently, it was chosen to obtain global academic information for bibliometric analysis based on previous publications ( Ekici et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although a visualized network and comprehensive analysis, it is feasible to investigate the publication condition, predict research trends, and thus analyses research hotspots in specific fields ( Zhang et al, 2022 ; Zhao et al, 2022 ). It is widely acknowledged that the combination of several bibliometric and mathematical tools, such as CiteSpace, the R package “bibliometrix” and VOSviewer, has also been widely used to visualize specific research literature analysis fields ( Wu et al, 2022b ; Zhang et al, 2022 ; Zhao et al, 2022 ). Accordingly, in this study, a new bibliometric statistics analysis with a visual network is performed to meet the unmet need and fill this knowledge gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%