1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80006-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research topics, author's specialty, and funding sources of articles published in an Emergency Medicine Journal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1984, when EM was still relatively new, an evaluation of articles in two separate EM journals between 1972 and 1981 found that 84% of the research was not funded, while 8% received government funding and 2% received industry funding. 5 A subsequent review of three major EM journals in 1985 and 1992 documented an increase in the percent of funded articles to 29%, although these studies were more likely to have received funding from industry sources. 6 In 1994, most existing EM residency programs (70%) were not closely affiliated with institutions receiving the majority of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1984, when EM was still relatively new, an evaluation of articles in two separate EM journals between 1972 and 1981 found that 84% of the research was not funded, while 8% received government funding and 2% received industry funding. 5 A subsequent review of three major EM journals in 1985 and 1992 documented an increase in the percent of funded articles to 29%, although these studies were more likely to have received funding from industry sources. 6 In 1994, most existing EM residency programs (70%) were not closely affiliated with institutions receiving the majority of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the American emergency medicine literature Podolsky and colleagues in 1984 5 and Powers in 1988 6 have shown a significant and disturbing increase in the number of authors per paper. As highlighted by Epstein 7 , this trend is common to the worldwide medical literature, and should be discouraged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These trends are similar to previous trends reported for the medical literature. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Tables 6 and 7 show that Uttar Pradesh was the main contributor to this increase. Articles from other states were likewise increased.…”
Section: Proportion Of Educational Degrees Of First (F) Last (L) Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Weeks et al 19 found the average number of authors per article increased from 4.5 in 1980 to 6.9 in 2000 in 4 medical journals. Podolsky et al 16 noted an increase in the number of authors per article from 1.1 in 1972 to 2.6 in 1981. Others have reported a steady increase in the proportion of articles with 6 or more authors.…”
Section: Proportion Of Educational Degrees Of First (F) Last (L) Amentioning
confidence: 99%