2012
DOI: 10.1210/me.2012-1031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Resource: Transcriptional Profiling in a Cellular Model of Breast Cancer Reveals Functional and Mechanistic Differences Between Clinically Relevant SERM and Between SERM/Estrogen Complexes

Abstract: Exploitation of the relationship between estrogen receptor (ER) structure and activity has led to the development of 1) selective ER modulators (SERM), compounds whose relative agonist/antagonist activities differ between target tissues; 2) selective ER degraders (SERD), compounds that induce a conformational change in the receptor that targets it for proteasomal degradation; and 3) tissue-selective estrogen complexes (TSEC), drugs in which a SERM and an ER agonist are combined to yield a blended activity that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
60
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
10
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since expression values are log2 transformed intensity values, a difference in expression by one unit corresponds to a twofold mean change in probe intensities. For comparison, corresponding differences between tamoxifen treated MCF7 cells and the average of vehicle control cells in the GEO:GSE35428 dataset [42] were also included in the heatmap. A Bioconductor ExpressionSet for GSE35428 was retrieved using the GEOquery package (2.32.0) [43].…”
Section: Cell Viability Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since expression values are log2 transformed intensity values, a difference in expression by one unit corresponds to a twofold mean change in probe intensities. For comparison, corresponding differences between tamoxifen treated MCF7 cells and the average of vehicle control cells in the GEO:GSE35428 dataset [42] were also included in the heatmap. A Bioconductor ExpressionSet for GSE35428 was retrieved using the GEOquery package (2.32.0) [43].…”
Section: Cell Viability Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, microarray analyses reveal a group of genes for which ER agonist and antagonist cooperatively regulate expression, suggesting additional models of combined agonist/antagonist action must exist (Chang et al, 2010;Wardell et al, 2012). We demonstrate that ER agonist/antagonist combined treatment can cooperatively activate gene expression through an ER-HLD complex consisting of one receptor monomer bound to agonist and another occupied by antagonist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Two recent microarray experiments demonstrated that, in MCF-7 cells treated with estrogen and SERMs, alone or in combination, there is a subset of genes induced to a greater extent by combined estrogen and SERM treatment than by either single agent (Chang et al, 2010;Wardell et al, 2012). The ability of ER-HLD to cooperatively regulate gene expression induced by combined agonist/antagonist treatments provides a possible mechanistic explanation for the induction, rather than the inhibition, of the expression of these genes.…”
Section: Activation Of Gene Expression By Er-heteroligand Dimersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ER ligands differ in their structures and their effects on ER conformation (26)(27)(28)(29). For example, Wardell et al tested 6 different ER ligands and observed different gene expression patterns regulated by different ER-ligand complexes (29). Unliganded ERα can also bind to chromatin and regulate gene expression (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%