2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2022.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research progress on seismic imaging technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 218 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of computational-time for the 2D field data, the proposed pre-stack LSRTM in pseudodepth domain algorithm takes around 13.00 hours, 12.00 GB memory and it is reducing the cost significantly comparing with conventional LSRTM results which is on the other hand takes about 25.0 hours and 21.50 GB memory. Several papers in the recent years have reported an instability in the cartesian-based P-wave modelling that is based on the acoustic approximation of the wave equation for an in-homogeneously transversely isotropic media with tilted symmetry axis (TTI media), then it had been studied and solved partially by Bakker & Duveneck (2011) for the wavefield modelling in Cartesian coordinates and more insightful progress about seismic imaging methods from common reflection surface (CRS) stack, Gaussian beam migration-based and wavefield extrapolation and inversion methods can be seen in Li and Qu (2022), and for details on workflow of LSRTM in Pseudodepth domain once can check Hussein A. H. Muhammed, (M.Sc. thesis, June 2022).…”
Section: Implementations On Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of computational-time for the 2D field data, the proposed pre-stack LSRTM in pseudodepth domain algorithm takes around 13.00 hours, 12.00 GB memory and it is reducing the cost significantly comparing with conventional LSRTM results which is on the other hand takes about 25.0 hours and 21.50 GB memory. Several papers in the recent years have reported an instability in the cartesian-based P-wave modelling that is based on the acoustic approximation of the wave equation for an in-homogeneously transversely isotropic media with tilted symmetry axis (TTI media), then it had been studied and solved partially by Bakker & Duveneck (2011) for the wavefield modelling in Cartesian coordinates and more insightful progress about seismic imaging methods from common reflection surface (CRS) stack, Gaussian beam migration-based and wavefield extrapolation and inversion methods can be seen in Li and Qu (2022), and for details on workflow of LSRTM in Pseudodepth domain once can check Hussein A. H. Muhammed, (M.Sc. thesis, June 2022).…”
Section: Implementations On Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the application of high‐performance computers in the field of seismic exploration, reverse time migration (RTM) has become an important method for imaging complex subsurface structures. RTM based on two‐way wave equations achieves wavefield extrapolation in complex subsurface structures to produce high‐quality images (Baysal et al., 1983; McMechan, 1983) and has clear advantages over migration methods based on ray or one‐way wave‐equation theories in imaging steeply dipping structures (Li & Qu, 2022; Sava & Hill, 2009; Zhu & Rline, 1998). When solving the two‐way wave equations, the finite‐difference method is considered to be the optimal method (Liu & Sen, 2009; Tan & Huang, 2014), which has high simulation accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of LSM has been applied to the one‐way wave migration (Clapp et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2018) and the ray‐based migration (Nemeth et al., 1999; Yuan et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2018). RTM has obvious advantages over ray‐based imaging methods and one‐way wave imaging methods in imaging the steep dipping geological structures, which has been widely used in the petroleum industry (Ristow & Rühl, 1994; Zhang et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2015; Yong et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2018; Li et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2022). In the context of RTM, the least‐squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) has been developed to improve imaging quality based on two‐way wave equation (Schuster, 1993; Yao & Wu, 2015; Li et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017; Li et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSRTM advantages include the enhancement of imaging resolution and the dramatic minimization of imaging artefacts in comparison to RTM. Therefore, LSRTM has been widely used for high-precision imaging in different media, such as elastic media (Feng & Schuster, 2017;Gu et al, 2018;Zhong et al, 2021), viscoelastic media (Guo et al, 2018;Zhang & Gao, 2022), viscoacoustic media (Dutta & Schuster, 2014;Sun, Fomel, Zhu, et al, 2016;, viscoacoustic anisotropy media (Gu et al, 2022;Qu et al, 2022) and elastic anisotropy media Chen et al, 2022). In addition to LSRTM application in acoustic anisotropic medium, Guo et al (2019) developed LSRTM method based on coupled pseudo-acoustic VTI wave equation, whereas the coupled pseudo-acoustic anisotropic wave equations are restricted by anisotropic parameters resulting in migration artefacts in the inverted images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%