2021
DOI: 10.1049/gtd2.12229
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on transformer fault diagnosis: Based on improved firefly algorithm optimized LPboost–classification and regression tree

Abstract: The information of dissolved gas in transformer oil can reflect the potential fault in oil immersed power transformer. In order to improve the accuracy of transformer fault diagnosis, a transformer fault diagnosis model based on IFA-LPboost-CART is proposed here. First, a LPboost-CART model is established. The classification and regression tree (CART) are used as the weak classifiers, and the linear programming boosting (LPboost) ensemble learning method is used to adjust the weight of each weak classifier to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the decision performance of each decision tree in random forest is different, the decision weights given to each tree are the same, which can weaken the accuracy of the model to some extent [2]. The use of a single algorithm is prone to poor model identification performance due to the randomness of the samples; however, model fusion works well for problems such as user credit identification, risk prediction, and power equipment fault diagnosis [3][4][5][6]. Therefore, in this paper, we applied the model fusion approach to risky user identification based on mobile network communication behavior and propose a Stacking model fusion mobile network risky user identification model based on feature selection and hybrid sampling to fully combine the advantages of various algo-rithms and complement each other's strengths to achieve an overall model performance improvement using model fusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the decision performance of each decision tree in random forest is different, the decision weights given to each tree are the same, which can weaken the accuracy of the model to some extent [2]. The use of a single algorithm is prone to poor model identification performance due to the randomness of the samples; however, model fusion works well for problems such as user credit identification, risk prediction, and power equipment fault diagnosis [3][4][5][6]. Therefore, in this paper, we applied the model fusion approach to risky user identification based on mobile network communication behavior and propose a Stacking model fusion mobile network risky user identification model based on feature selection and hybrid sampling to fully combine the advantages of various algo-rithms and complement each other's strengths to achieve an overall model performance improvement using model fusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%