“…Meanwhile, 33.35% of articles did not have a specific study design ( Albott et al, 2020 ; Cole et al, 2020 ; Donnelly et al, 2020 ; Robert E. Feinstein et al, 2020 ; Gonzalez et al, 2020 ; Mira et al, 2020 ; Ping et al, 2020 ; Schreiber et al, 2019 ), since they just described the interventions implemented, and were classified as narrative descriptions. As for the infectious disease outbreaks, the vast majority of articles referred to COVID-19 pandemics (70.7%) ( Albott et al, 2020 ; Blake et al, 2020 ; Buselli et al, 2020 ; Cai et al, 2020 ; Cheng et al, 2020 ; Cheung et al, 2020 ; Cole et al, 2020 ; Donnelly et al, 2020 ; Robert E. Feinstein et al, 2020 ; Geoffroy et al, 2020 ; Giordano et al, 2020 ; Gonzalez et al, 2020 ; Hong et al, 2020 ; Mira et al, 2020 ; Ping et al, 2020 ; Sockalingam et al, 2020 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ), 12.5% to SARS ( Chen et al, 2006 ; Khee et al, 2004 ; Maunder et al, 2003 ), and 8.4% to Ebola ( Schreiber et al, 2019 ; Waterman et al, 2018 ) and Influenza A H1N1 ( Aiello et al, 2011 ; Maunder et al, 2010 ), respectively. When reported, the sample size ranged from 25 nurses in a pilot study in Malaysia ( Ping et al, 2020 ), to 10240 staff members in a cross-sectional study in China ( Hong et al, 2020 ) during COVID-19.…”