The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1108/qmr.2000.3.4.215.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Methods for Business Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The researchers used a quantitative approach to investigate the relationships between independent and dependent variables (Bell et al , 2018; Thornhill et al ., 2009). They developed a structured questionnaire to collect data on each of the variables included in the proposed framework, relying on well-developed items from prior research to measure the proposed variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers used a quantitative approach to investigate the relationships between independent and dependent variables (Bell et al , 2018; Thornhill et al ., 2009). They developed a structured questionnaire to collect data on each of the variables included in the proposed framework, relying on well-developed items from prior research to measure the proposed variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epistemology of this paper is founded on a social constructionism paradigm, as is the selected ontological viewpoint. Interactions with people, the environment, and the traits in people's behaviors all contribute to the creation of realities (Saunders et al, 2012). Language has an impact on how people convey their experiences since it can make a difference in people's understandings (Esterby-Smith et al, 2018).…”
Section: Research Philosophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To know the reliability of the instrument; Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated, and the reliability coefficient was (0.871), as shown in Table (1). According to Bryman and Bell (2011) and Saunders et al (2016), a value of (60%) or above indicates an acceptable level of response reliability. This indicates its validity for application to the study population as a whole and its sample.…”
Section: Data Collection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%