Research foresight in bridging open science and open innovation: Overview based on the complex thinking paradigm

Sanabria-Z, Jorge; Cruz-Sandoval, Marco; Moreno-Romo, Athziri; Bosch-Gómez, Sofía; Ramírez-Montoya, María Soledad

doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2023.08.002

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…J. Sanabria-Z et al [18] conducted interesting research that identifies an opportunity to develop researchers' complex thinking, leading to information openness becoming a shared responsibility of partners. As the authors argue, shared responsibility may have implications that permeate open science and open innovation theory.…”

Section: Open Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sharing Heritage through Open Innovation—An Attempt to Apply the Concept of Open Innovation in Heritage Education and the Reconstruction of Cultural Identity

Szromek,

Bugdol

2024

Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The topic of cultural heritage is the subject of many interdisciplinary studies. So far, these studies have focused on the issues of classifying particular types of heritage, their functions and benefits, components and determinants. However, relatively less attention was paid to the dimension of a methodical approach to education and rebuilding cultural identity through heritage. Meanwhile, generational changes, especially in the dimension of knowledge perception, indicate such a need. The aim of this article is to present the perspective of using open innovations in the transfer of cultural heritage used in shaping cultural identity and education. Our review and conceptual article is an attempt to draw attention to the problem of changes in the perception of cultural heritage by generations born in the era of the digital revolution and the need to take these changes into account in heritage education. Taking these conditions into account allowed the authors to develop a model for generating open innovation in the outside-in process and then to develop a model for making it available through the inside-out process. The role of education in this process was also emphasized.

show abstract

Section: Open Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sharing Heritage through Open Innovation—An Attempt to Apply the Concept of Open Innovation in Heritage Education and the Reconstruction of Cultural Identity

Szromek,

Bugdol

2024

Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is a definite gap in the knowledge that may impede further studies on the transformations in cultures of research taking shape throughout the world, mainly publications on open research culture (Ma et al, 2024;Sanabria-Z et al, 2024). Tucker & Tilt (2019) maintain that the notion of research culture is inclined to diverse interpretations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Culture of Research: A Systematic Scoping Review

Tikhonova,

Raitskaya

2024

JLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Research culture is the core of many processes in science. It is a broad concept presumably entailing practices, traditions, norms, etc. that prevail among researchers and other stakeholders in the field. Its definition, architecture, and taxonomy are essential in generating and pursuing scientific policies at universities and countries. As there is a lack of comprehensive reviews on research culture, the present publication aspires to fill the existing gap in the knowledge. This review aims to define research culture and build an architecture of research culture based on the relevant literature indexed in the Scopus database. Method: The problem, concept, and context (PCC) framework was applied to establish an effective search strategy and word the research questions corresponding to the aim. Based on Arksey and O'Malley's methodology (2005) and PRISMA checklist (2020) for systematic reviews, the authors sorted out 56 relevant publications for systematic scoping review. In addition, a bibliometric analysis was applied to examine the field. Results: Using a bibliometric analysis, the 56 publications were distributed by year, country, most prolific authors, sources, research fields, affiliation, and type of publication. With the help of VOSviewer, the authors singled out four thematic clusters (research culture; medical and biomedical research, methodology and research ethics, and clinical studies and human experiments). After synthesizing the data extracted from the documents under review, research culture was defined; components of research culture were singled out and summed up; and a framework of research culture was made up. The authors analysed the review findings in contrast with other research, offering their own comprehensive definition of research culture, its taxonomy, and an architecture of research culture. Conclusion: The current review adds to the understanding of research culture, its gist, component classification. The limitation related to the period of review (2019-2024) may be overcome by further reviews of relevant publications from a historic perspective that would broaden perceptions of the origin of modern research culture and its negative aspects.

show abstract

“…Regarding the higher education arena, a study by Farias-Gaytan et al (2023) on digital transformation in the face of complexity emphasized the need to improve the digital literacy of educators and students to deal with the demands of the workplace and suggests institutions assess and strengthen their competencies to optimize learning outcomes. In an analysis of the role of researchers in facing the challenges of the converging open science and open innovation paradigm, Sanabria-Z et al (2023a) highlighted the lack of awareness of the concept of complex thinking and how crucial it will be in the training of future managerial professionals. As we move forward with Education 4.0, featuring technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT) and blockchain, tapping into their potential to foster and assess complex thinking in educational scenarios becomes critical.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

AI platform model on 4IR megatrend challenges: complex thinking by active and transformational learning

Sanabria-Z,

Olivo

2024

ITSE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The objective of this study is to propose a model for the implementation of a technological platform for participants to develop solutions to problems related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) megatrends, and taking advantage of artificial intelligence (AI) to develop their complex thinking through co-creation work. Design/methodology/approach The development of the model is based on a combination of participatory action research and user-centered design (UCD) methodologies, seeking to ensure that the platform is user-oriented and based on the experiences of the authors. The model itself is structured around the active and transformational learning (ATL) framework. Findings This study highlights the importance of addressing 4IR megatrends in education to prepare students for a technology-driven world. The proposed model, based on ATL and supported by AI, integrates essential competencies for tackling challenges and generating innovative solutions. The integration of AI into the platform fosters personalized learning, collaboration and reflection and enhances creativity by offering new insights and tools, whereas UCD ensures alignment with user needs and expectations. Originality/value This research presents an innovative educational model that combines ATL with AI to foster complex thinking and co-creation of solutions to problems related to 4IR megatrends. Integrating ATL ensures engagement with real-world problems and critical thinking while AI provides personalized content, tutoring, data analysis and creative support. The collaborative platform encourages diverse perspectives and collective intelligence, benefiting other researchers to better conceive learner-centered platforms promoting 21st-century skills and co-creation.

show abstract

Research foresight in bridging open science and open innovation: Overview based on the complex thinking paradigm

Cited by 8 publications

References 34 publications

Sharing Heritage through Open Innovation—An Attempt to Apply the Concept of Open Innovation in Heritage Education and the Reconstruction of Cultural Identity

Sharing Heritage through Open Innovation—An Attempt to Apply the Concept of Open Innovation in Heritage Education and the Reconstruction of Cultural Identity

The Culture of Research: A Systematic Scoping Review

AI platform model on 4IR megatrend challenges: complex thinking by active and transformational learning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About