1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-3287(97)00027-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research by the people, for the people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I began the research with a year of participant observation in a Honduran community organization in Chelsea, Massachusetts, a Central American enclave on the outskirts of Boston. From the start, I was committed to doing participatory research that is “rooted in the community” and “encourages citizen participation” (Sclove, 1997, p. 541). During this first year, I worked closely with a Honduran women's group, translated documents for the organization's Spanish‐speaking staff, and attended local cultural events and political rallies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I began the research with a year of participant observation in a Honduran community organization in Chelsea, Massachusetts, a Central American enclave on the outskirts of Boston. From the start, I was committed to doing participatory research that is “rooted in the community” and “encourages citizen participation” (Sclove, 1997, p. 541). During this first year, I worked closely with a Honduran women's group, translated documents for the organization's Spanish‐speaking staff, and attended local cultural events and political rallies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most encompassing definitions of CBPR position it as research rooted in the community, serving a community's interest, encouraging community participation at all levels, and geared toward affecting social change. 21 Principles of CBPR practice generally flow from the above conceptualization. For example, in writing about CBPR in the area of public health research, Barbara Israel and colleagues articulate nine essential principles of practice.…”
Section: Problems That Remain: Addressing the Dual Imperativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Elzen, Enserink, & Smit, 1996;Roe Smith & Marx, 1994). Analysts of technological development could explore possibilities to implement "societal priorities" on the basis of "research in action"-that is, by making suggestions to various actors who are attempting to solve concrete problems, and by analyzing why these suggestions are (or are not) picked up, and how this affects the subsequent development process (Elzen et al, 1996;Sclove, 1997).…”
Section: Mot and The Social Control Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, authors like Roe Smith and Marx (1994) wrote that technologies are not autonomous but are social products susceptible to democratic controls, which is a key issue in democratic theory. Beyond that, some authors (e.g., Borgmann, 1989;López Cerezo, Méndez, & Todt, 1998;Sclove, 1995Sclove, , 1997 focus their social studies of technology on public participation. Sclove is perhaps one of the most convinced defenders of the idea of giving people more participation in scientific and technological issues and limiting the growing role of the experts in society.…”
Section: Mot and The Social Control Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%