Research Articles: Case Study: Collaborative Governance as a Tool for Natural Resource Management in China and the United States

DuPraw, Marcelle E.; Brennan, Bernadette V.; Placht, Maria T.

doi:10.1017/s1466046613000240

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Meanwhile, the aspect of distributive responsibility includes the implementation of the distribution principle of management, decision making, and responsibility. This opinion is in line with DuPraw et al's assessment that there are 3 (three) principles of government collaboration, including firstly involving every level of government and scientists in every process of activities and programs; secondly, providing sufficient space for the use of local resources and ecology, and thirdly to provide space for all stakeholders to provide feedback (DuPraw et al, 2013).…”

Section: Collaborative Governance Strategy On Post-disaster Social Po...supporting

confidence: 75%

Is There Any Collaborative Governance on Post-disaster Social Policy in Banten Province?

Thahir¹

2022

J. Bina Praja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social policies include increased social protection, approaches to improving living standards, and access to decent work. The description discusses two concepts, namely collaborative governance and the concept of social policy. Methodologically and technically, the two concepts are side by side in the context of implementing decentralization policies. Collaborative governance as collaboration is a relationship designed to solve a problem through the creation of solutions in conditions that are full of limitations (Ansell & Gash, 2008). At the same time, the social policy responds to social problems, which tends to ignore the assessment of some people that they are not in a socially problematic condition (Spicker, 2014). social policy has many forms, such as health, education, housing, and other social services. The method uses a descriptive qualitative and qualitative verification analysis strategy model. Post-disaster handling, collaborative governance is applied through the government's efforts to carry out recovery that focuses on the residential, economic, infrastructure, social and cross-sectoral sectors. The results also show obstacles in collaborative governance, such as delays in building houses for the community, mismatch of specifications between what was promised and what was received by the community, and low public understanding. This study also shows that post-disaster management collaborative governance can be implemented using several strategies divided by sector and sub-sector; the right communication pattern increases community involvement in the entire post-disaster management process in Banten province. All strategies would be better if packaged in the form of government innovation. This means that post-disaster management, especially in repair and development efforts, is an important agenda for government collaboration.

show abstract

Section: Collaborative Governance Strategy On Post-disaster Social Po...supporting

confidence: 75%

Is There Any Collaborative Governance on Post-disaster Social Policy in Banten Province?

Thahir¹

2022

J. Bina Praja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although China emphasizes centralization, it also tends to multi-agent environmental governance [34][35][36]. In China, a growing number of people has expressed their concerns about pollution and strong demands for environmental governance.…”

Section: Dedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China

Li²

2020

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From the discourse analysis perspective, ecopolitics has experienced a discourse change from authoritarianism to democracy. This study uses theory of authoritarianism and democracy in ecopolitics to explore the impact of authoritarian ecopolitical discourse (AED) and democratic ecopolitical discourse (DED) on environmental quality in China. After analysis using panel data and comparison of three main regions, results suggest a negative relationship between AED of the central government and environmental quality. By contrast, a positive relationship exists between AED of local governments and environmental quality. A positive relationship exists between DED, which measures the proposals of People's Congress deputies and Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), and environmental quality. Nevertheless, the positive effect of DED is weaker than that of AED. The impact is also different among the regions. Our interpretations are as follows. China's current governance mechanism is a top-down decision-making mechanism, rather than a bottom-up information transmission mechanism. The concentration of power keeps decisionmaking power and resources away from levels with considerably accurate information and capabilities in problem solving. Therefore, we suggest that governments should change their decision-making process and exert effort to be transparent to the entire society. A bottom-up mechanism of information collection and transmission should be established, such as environmental inspection mechanism and checking on cadres' achievements with green GDP.

show abstract

“…Several parties still face significant challenges in implementing collaboration, like China's conditions in 2012 for Natural Resources Management. China cannot emulate collaborative governance for this sector mainly because of the absence of an incentive system (DuPraw et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Governance in the Optimization of Tax Revenue: Case Study in Yogyakarta

Arsandi¹

2022

J. Bina Praja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Yogyakarta Regional Tax Office always has difficulty satisfying tax revenue targets year by year. For example, Yogyakarta’s DGT could not meet the revenue target in the last three years, while DGCE always exceeded the target. Reflecting on this condition, Yogyakarta Regional Tax Office needs help from other agencies in the form of collaborative governance that might help them achieve the set targets. Meanwhile, there is a lot of research on Collaborative Governance, but robust generalizations to link theory and practice are still being sought. In order to complement between theory and practice of collaboration, this study discusses the implementation of Collaborative Governance for optimizing state revenues by conducting case studies at the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) and the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE) in Yogyakarta. The qualitative method was used with data acquisition through interviews and literature studies. Based on the results, it was found that Collaborative Governance in Yogyakarta is following the Emerson, Nabatchi, and Balogh framework (2012) since it has several system contexts and strong drivers. Resource Conditions and Socio-Economic Conditions are the system context behind the collaboration between the two agencies. Meanwhile, Leadership, Dependence, and Uncertainty are the drivers that trigger Collaborative Governance. Furthermore, by using data matching, the researcher identified the potency of tax revenue from the bonded zone that could be elaborated in Yogyakarta. Finally, we identified several obstacles and challenges to implementing Collaborative Governance in Yogyakarta and formulated practical and theoretical recommendations for them.

show abstract

Research Articles: Case Study: Collaborative Governance as a Tool for Natural Resource Management in China and the United States

Cited by 6 publications

References 6 publications

Is There Any Collaborative Governance on Post-disaster Social Policy in Banten Province?

Is There Any Collaborative Governance on Post-disaster Social Policy in Banten Province?

Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China

Collaborative Governance in the Optimization of Tax Revenue: Case Study in Yogyakarta

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About