Rescheduling flowshops under simultaneous disruptions

Enclosing rail capacity/punctuality in accessibility measures: a two-step approach by using Data Envelopment Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process

“…However, it is seldom verified in real SCs [21,22], since the relationships among firms in dynamic SCs are more complicated than simple one-to-one buyer-supplier connections [19,23]. The challenges imposed by the new generation of SCs [24,25,26,27] advocate for more realistic models to analyze the growing complexity of those structures. In the IRI context, it would be of benefit to assess the impact of errors in SCs characterized by more than one member in the same echelon of the chain, such as arborescent SCs [4,28].…”

“…Accessibility is a complex concept with various facets; it has been widely treated in the scientific literature of the last years [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and also in several European and international research projects or studies [22][23][24]. Inter alia accessibility could be defined as 'the amount of effort for a person to reach a destination' or 'the number of activities which can be reached from a certain location'; indicators of accessibility measure the benefits households and firms in an area enjoy from the existence and use of the transport infrastructure relevant for their area.…”

“…Previously, different methods have been developed to detect and quantify tremor. For example, accelerometers [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], gyroscopes [22], and electromyography (EMG) [23], [24], [25] have been used extensively to obtain quantitative measurements of tremor. Despite of the difference of devices and systems, all of these methods are focusing on the tremor itself.…”

“…A literature review of the last 30 years researches on material handling equipment selection has identified 27 articles on this subject: Bookbinder and Gervais [3], Chakraborty and Banik [4], Chan, Ip and Lau [5], Cho and Egbelu [6], Chu, Egbelu and Wu [7], Fisher, Farber and Kay [8], Fonseca, Uppal and Greene [9], Gabbert and Brown [10], Hassan [11], Hassan [12], Hassan, Hogg and Smith [13], Kim and Eom [14], Kulak [15], Malmborg, Krishnakumar, Simons and Agee [16], Maniya and Bhatt [17], Matson, Mellichamph and Swaminathan [18], Mirhosseyni and Webb [19], Onut, Kara and Mert [20], Park [21], Raman, Nagalingam, Gurd and Lin [22], Sharp, et al [23], Telek [24], Trevino, Hurley, Clincy and Jang [25], Tuzkaya, Gülsün, Kahraman and Özgen [26], Velury and Kennedy [27], Welgama and Gibson [28], and Yaman [29].…”

“…41, pp. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]1995.. In other words, performance management systems (PMSs) encompass performance measurement systems (PMeS), but not the other way around M. Coveney, "Performance management vs. performance measurement" in FSN: Business Systems News and Analysis for Finance and IT Professionals, 2010..…”