2000
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.00178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rescaling the Balanced Scorecard for Local Government

Abstract: Scorecard' model has gained worldwide interest from managers in private and public organisations. The four perspectives of the model aim to communicate the strategic priorities of the organisation by measuring and setting stretch targets for them. However, the model, which was developed in 'for-profit' organisations, may not be suitable in 'not-for-profit' organisations. A possible solution is the use of the Australian Business Excellence Framework categories to determine the perspectives to be used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier public sector KPI research has noted that the initial KPI selection is often made along the lines of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) defined by Kaplan andNorton (1992, see e.g. Klingner, 2006;McAdam and Walker, 2003;Quinlivan, 2000;Tönnisson, 2004). However, the KPI use is often adjusted for political or legitimacy reasons to the managers' or politicians' will to measure only some suitable aspects of performance (Carmona and Grönlund, 2003;Johnsen, 2005;Muñoz et al, 2006;Navarro et al, 2008;Northcott and Llewellyn, 2003;Norverto et al, 2000;Radnor and McGuire, 2004;Wilson, 2004).…”
Section: Multiple Institutional Logics and Kpismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier public sector KPI research has noted that the initial KPI selection is often made along the lines of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) defined by Kaplan andNorton (1992, see e.g. Klingner, 2006;McAdam and Walker, 2003;Quinlivan, 2000;Tönnisson, 2004). However, the KPI use is often adjusted for political or legitimacy reasons to the managers' or politicians' will to measure only some suitable aspects of performance (Carmona and Grönlund, 2003;Johnsen, 2005;Muñoz et al, 2006;Navarro et al, 2008;Northcott and Llewellyn, 2003;Norverto et al, 2000;Radnor and McGuire, 2004;Wilson, 2004).…”
Section: Multiple Institutional Logics and Kpismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of BSC can be largely attributed to innovation driven by empirical evidence of weaknesses in the devices created, rather than in the original idea. However, BSC usefulness as a management tool in business context has been advocated from both the theoretical and practical view (Kaplan and Norton, 1992, 1997, 2000, 2001a, 2001bOlve et al, 1999;Chang, 2006;Quilivan, 2000;Bolívar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally, the BSC model was developed in "for-profit" organizations, therefore it may not be very suitable for "not-for-profit" organizations [5]. Besides, China has its own specific political system and strategic positioning.…”
Section: Rescaling Balanced Scorecardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financial considerations can play an enabling or constraining role but will rarely be the primary objective [6]. Typically, most governments prioritize nonfinancial outcome measures, such as customer or stakeholder perspectives, rather than a financial perspective at the top [5]. In some cases, the four perspectives can be reduced to three.…”
Section: Rescaling Balanced Scorecardmentioning
confidence: 99%