2021
DOI: 10.5194/wcd-2-759-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resampling of ENSO teleconnections: accounting for cold-season evolution reduces uncertainty in the North Atlantic

Abstract: Abstract. We re-examine the uncertainty of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) teleconnection to the North Atlantic following the investigation of Deser et al. (2017) (DES2017). Our analyses are performed on the November–December (ND) and January–February (JF) means separately and for a geographical area that covers a larger extent in the midlatitude North Atlantic than DES2017. The motivation for splitting the cold season in this way arises from the fact that the teleconnection patterns and underlying phy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(71 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, this study contributes to a larger body of literature arguing that seasonal‐mean analyses of teleconnections, and of stratosphere–troposphere coupling in particular, can blur over important details (Jiménez‐Esteve and Domeisen, 2018; Kretschmer et al ., 2018a; King et al ., 2021). While differences in the monthly surface response to SSWs were here demonstrated to be the result of the SSW definition, other teleconnections and their seasonal dependencies might give further insights into European climate variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More generally, this study contributes to a larger body of literature arguing that seasonal‐mean analyses of teleconnections, and of stratosphere–troposphere coupling in particular, can blur over important details (Jiménez‐Esteve and Domeisen, 2018; Kretschmer et al ., 2018a; King et al ., 2021). While differences in the monthly surface response to SSWs were here demonstrated to be the result of the SSW definition, other teleconnections and their seasonal dependencies might give further insights into European climate variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the influence of La Niña on the NAO is mostly observed during February but not during the other winter months (Jiménez‐Esteve and Domeisen, 2018). Similarly, the North Atlantic response to ENSO in late autumn was proposed to be different compared to mid‐winter (King et al ., 2021). Understanding how these other mechanisms are related to our findings and contribute to differences in the surface response to SSWs is important but is beyond the scope of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and high-latitude Eurasian snow cover (J. L. Cohen et al, 2012;Furtado et al, 2015;Orsolini & Kvamstø, 2009; may have significant influences on the climate over the downstream East Asia through inducing a distinct thermal and dynamical teleconnection. Most of these studies have focused on seasonal mean conditions, while more and more studies emphasized that the teleconnections on the monthly time scale are different to the seasonal mean (He & Wang, 2013;King et al, 2018King et al, , 2021.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For consistency with the tropical teleconnections discussed in Sect. 4, which display a significant sub-seasonal variability (Ayarzagüena et al, 2018;King et al, 2021), we compute these covariances from bi-monthly mean anomalies in January and February (JF) over the 1981-2020 period. The same teleconnection patterns, computed from ERA5 data, are also shown for comparison.…”
Section: Atmospheric Mean State and Teleconnectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%