Information Systems Development 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4951-5_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements Elicitation with Web-Based Focus Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, use cases are an effective technique if they are used as a secondary technique. According to the authors in [161, 175–177], the workshops were considered effective because these help stakeholders to negotiate and collaborate in an effective way. Duggan and Thachenkary [157] affirmed that JAD is an effective technique for eliciting quality requirements. JAD is often used with rapid AD, an iterative and incremental approach for improving the quality and speed of a system design by supporting it with structured methods and computer aided software engineering (CASE) tools. Researches by the authors in [82, 84–86, 164] state that the focus group technique is effective because it promotes the discussion among stakeholder with the aim of formalising the requirements. Niknafs and Berry [93] and Konaté et al [94] consider that brainstorming is an effective technique for eliciting needs by producing, voting, organising, and reviewing in a collaborative way all the ideas. Ordóñez et al [152] show the effectiveness of the business process models compared with user stories in software agile development. The results indicate a higher effectiveness for models as a primary technique because these enable analysts to clearly specify the stakeholders’ needs and business objectives. Isabirye and Flowerday [164] propose to use the user stories as a primary technique because the user stories take advantage of the usual mode of communication among stakeholders in order to obtain a complete understanding of the problem and its context (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, use cases are an effective technique if they are used as a secondary technique. According to the authors in [161, 175–177], the workshops were considered effective because these help stakeholders to negotiate and collaborate in an effective way. Duggan and Thachenkary [157] affirmed that JAD is an effective technique for eliciting quality requirements. JAD is often used with rapid AD, an iterative and incremental approach for improving the quality and speed of a system design by supporting it with structured methods and computer aided software engineering (CASE) tools. Researches by the authors in [82, 84–86, 164] state that the focus group technique is effective because it promotes the discussion among stakeholder with the aim of formalising the requirements. Niknafs and Berry [93] and Konaté et al [94] consider that brainstorming is an effective technique for eliciting needs by producing, voting, organising, and reviewing in a collaborative way all the ideas. Ordóñez et al [152] show the effectiveness of the business process models compared with user stories in software agile development. The results indicate a higher effectiveness for models as a primary technique because these enable analysts to clearly specify the stakeholders’ needs and business objectives. Isabirye and Flowerday [164] propose to use the user stories as a primary technique because the user stories take advantage of the usual mode of communication among stakeholders in order to obtain a complete understanding of the problem and its context (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researches by the authors in [82, 84–86, 164] state that the focus group technique is effective because it promotes the discussion among stakeholder with the aim of formalising the requirements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a prototyping approach is widely acknowledged for the RE process and is especially useful in FG [41] and should also stimulate the discussion [11]. Overall, we conducted four FG.…”
Section: Focus Groups (Fg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farinha and Silva [11] argue that FG utilize synergies among the participants and solve some of the communication challenges with regard to RE.…”
Section: Focus Groups (Fg)mentioning
confidence: 99%