2016
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2013.0611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reputation as a Benefitanda Burden? How Stakeholders’ Organizational Identification Affects the Role of Reputation Following a Negative Event

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
236
1
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
12
236
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The signal of CSR, accordingly, will enable various stakeholders to believe that the firm will deliver values for the society [41]. The engagement of CSR can reinforce the social approval of the firm from stakeholders [32]. Such socially-constructed perception on the firms can be a part of organizational reputation.…”
Section: Csr Performance and Foreign Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The signal of CSR, accordingly, will enable various stakeholders to believe that the firm will deliver values for the society [41]. The engagement of CSR can reinforce the social approval of the firm from stakeholders [32]. Such socially-constructed perception on the firms can be a part of organizational reputation.…”
Section: Csr Performance and Foreign Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholders, defined as "any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization's objectives" [29] (p. 46), construct general reputation of the firm by establishing the public recognition and social approval of it [30,31]. Inter-relationships between the firm and its stakeholders develop over time, and it can prompt stakeholders to make positive contributions to the organization [32][33][34]. For example, if a firm develops various ways to secures equal employment or training and career development of its employees, employees in the firm are likely to have strong organizational commitment [35,36].…”
Section: Csr Performance and Foreign Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, disclosure of information affects the perception of stakeholders about how the company, significantly influences the reputation of the firm and is a key element to safeguard the identity of the corporation (Hooghiemstra, 2000). This is not the only benefit of corporate reputation, as this stock variable (Zavyalova et al, 2016) is the result of trustworthy behavior (Hosmer, 1995) and provides other benefits such as financial value (Schnietz & Epstein, 2005), positive effects on human resources or consumer interest (Hogarth et al, 2016) and generates status (George et al, 2016), which encourages companies to improve the way of achieving corporate reputation.…”
Section: Csr Transparency and Corporate Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focuses on the relationship between CSR and corporate reputation and contributes to the current literature by highlighting that the company will achieve higher reputation by implementing CSR actions when transparency beyond disclosure is included and examined. Delving into this relationship is motivated by the benefits that greater reputation may have for a company (Zavyalova, Pfarrer, Reger, & Hubbard, 2016), for example financial value (Schnietz & Epstein, 2005), employee recruitment and retention benefits (Hogarth, Hutchinson, & Scaife, 2016), customer interest (Hogarth et al, 2016) or status (George, Dahlander, Graffin, & Sim, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review (see also Table 1-2) reveals that few studies were carried on higher education contexts and the majority of them on students OID or alumni (Zavyalova et al, 2016) and very few on staff and mostly qualitative in nature (Puusa & Kekale, 2015;Humphreys & Brown, 2002).…”
Section: Antecedents and Forms Of Organisational Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%