2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive potential of Echinococcus multilocularis in experimentally infected foxes, dogs, raccoon dogs and cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
194
1
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
194
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…of 1 month). These were estimated from the results of experimental infections of dogs with E. multilocularis (Lukashenko, 1975;Kapel et al, 2006). Abundance models were also analysed utilising the numbers of parasites observed in each dog as a result of arecoline purgation.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of 1 month). These were estimated from the results of experimental infections of dogs with E. multilocularis (Lukashenko, 1975;Kapel et al, 2006). Abundance models were also analysed utilising the numbers of parasites observed in each dog as a result of arecoline purgation.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domestic carnivores, such as dogs and cats, are potential hosts. Even though cats' behaviour could favour their infection, among rodents predation, their physiology presents a lower susceptibility to infection and eggs excretion (Kapel et al, 2006). Contribution of domestic carnivores to human exposure in Europe is still unclear and their proximity to man may pose a major zoonotic risk (Petavy et al, 2000;Romig et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the improved flotation technique was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than that of routine flotation techniques (Tables I and II). No correlation was found between total worm counts and faecal egg count in fox faeces, which can be explained by the intermittent shedding of eggs (Kapel et al 2006). This sensitivity is similar to, or lower than that of other postmortem and antemortem diagnostic techniques (Table IV).…”
Section: Depending On Prevalence Of Infectionmentioning
confidence: 66%