2021
DOI: 10.1111/azo.12374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive performance of Macrobrachium acanthurus (Crustacea, Palaemonidae) females subjected to unilateral eyestalk ablation

Abstract: The present study investigated the effects of eyestalk ablation on the reproductive performance of females from the native caridean shrimp Macrobrachium acanthurus. The reproduction parameters fertility, fecundity, egg volume, larvae size, loss of embryos and number of females with viable eggs/larvae were evaluated. Females presenting carapace length of 12–15 mm and spent stage of gonadal development were divided into two groups, one undergoing unilateral eyestalk ablation and the other remaining intact. The s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Information campaigns could be integrated into or supported by certificates or labels -for example, 'fishmeal free' -that extend existing ones such as the ASC (Aquaculture Stewardship Council), BAP (Best Aquaculture Practices), and ATBF (Antibiotic Free) to promote sustainable, insect-based aquaculture. Consumer acceptance could be further improved by implementing higher animal welfare standards for insects and crustaceans, because current widespread production techniques such as eye ablation to enhance crustacean reproductive success remain controversial (Bardera et al, 2019;Gjerris et al, 2016;Rodrigues et al, 2021;Zacarias et al, 2019). For example, EU regulations on animal welfare currently exclude most invertebrates (cephalopods are an exception), which contradicts the stated aim of protecting sentient beings (Gjerris et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Legal Framework and Consumer Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information campaigns could be integrated into or supported by certificates or labels -for example, 'fishmeal free' -that extend existing ones such as the ASC (Aquaculture Stewardship Council), BAP (Best Aquaculture Practices), and ATBF (Antibiotic Free) to promote sustainable, insect-based aquaculture. Consumer acceptance could be further improved by implementing higher animal welfare standards for insects and crustaceans, because current widespread production techniques such as eye ablation to enhance crustacean reproductive success remain controversial (Bardera et al, 2019;Gjerris et al, 2016;Rodrigues et al, 2021;Zacarias et al, 2019). For example, EU regulations on animal welfare currently exclude most invertebrates (cephalopods are an exception), which contradicts the stated aim of protecting sentient beings (Gjerris et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Legal Framework and Consumer Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…y es utilizado en estudios de biología reproductiva, calidad reproductiva y fecundidad en decápodos(Paschoal et al 2019, Rodrigues et al 2022. Sin embargo, algunos estudios han evidenciado que, a pesar de la inclusión de lípidos y proteínas en las dietas experimentales, el VH no varía, como lo demostraron Cavalli et al(2000) con M. rosenbergii, Villafuerte-Mojica et al (2016) y Hernández-Abad et al (2018), con M. acanthurus, y García-Guerrero et al (2021) y el presente estudio con M. tenellum.…”
unclassified