“…† Within-vs. between-population crosses. Fitness of progeny from within-population crosses can be greater than, equal to or less than that of those from between-population crosses, and it may vary between populations and fitness traits (Riley, 1956;van Treuren et al, 1993;Hauser and Loeschcke, 1994;Dahlgaard and Warncke, 1995;Trame et al, 1995;Fischer and Matthies, 1997;Byers, 1998;Richter and Weiss, 1998;Affre and Thompson, 1999;Sheridan and Karowe, 2000;Emery and McCauley, 2002;Luijten et al, 2002;Colling et al, 2004;Heliyanto et al, 2005;Becker et al, 2006;Busch, 2006;Ricardo et al, 2006;Billingham et al, 2007;Willi et al, 2007;Cañ o et al, 2008;Raabová et al, 2009;Forrest et al, 2011). In a meta-analysis, Angeloni et al (2011) found that d did not vary between intra-and interpopulation crosses, which indicates that neither outbreeding depression nor heterosis commonly occurs as a result of crosses between populations.…”