1969
DOI: 10.2307/1218671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive Biology in Relation to Systematics

Abstract: Summary Many of the diverse floral characteristics used by taxonomists in assessing relationships among taxa represent adaptations to specific pollinators or pollinating methods. Therefore, the diversity of reproductive methods that occurs within a phylad has a strong influence on the number of taxa that are generally recognized in the phylad. Such evolutionary phenomena as convergence and adaptive radiation of floral patterns influence the taxonomic status of various phylads or the relationships that are seen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
213
3
7

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
10
213
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analyses failed to support the sectional classification of van Royen (1951) , perhaps due to evolutionary lability in anther dehiscence, which in other plants often correlates with the breeding system (i.e. introrse dehiscence with autogamy and extrorse dehiscence with xenogamy; Ornduff 1969 ). The resolution of Apinagia s. s. in our analysis (clade C) supports the monophyly of section Apinagia as defined by Tulasne (1849Tulasne ( , 1852, but not as modified by van Royen (1951) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Our analyses failed to support the sectional classification of van Royen (1951) , perhaps due to evolutionary lability in anther dehiscence, which in other plants often correlates with the breeding system (i.e. introrse dehiscence with autogamy and extrorse dehiscence with xenogamy; Ornduff 1969 ). The resolution of Apinagia s. s. in our analysis (clade C) supports the monophyly of section Apinagia as defined by Tulasne (1849Tulasne ( , 1852, but not as modified by van Royen (1951) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…I). The chief morphological differences used to separate the two taxa are associated with the flowers, and all are consistent with those characters typically correlated with a shift to autogamy (Ornduff, 1969). Populations from a given site are relatively uniform in their morphology.…”
Section: Granite Outcrop Species Ofarenariasupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The only character that fails to vary in the predicted manner is the number ofovules per ovary. Most selfers show a reduction in ovule number compared to their outcrossing relatives (Ornduff, 1969). In A. uniflora, however, the pattern is complex and not clearly related to variation in the breeding system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several other studies have reported that per flower production of both pollen and ovules is reduced in selfers compared to related outcrossing taxa, suggesting a positive correlation between the two traits, e.g. Eichhornia (Barrett, 1985) and unreported taxa (Ornduff, 1969). However, both Lloyd (1965) and Wyatt (1984) reported no consistent differences in ovule production between outcrossing and selfing taxa of Leavenworthia and Arenaria, respectively, although pollen production was lower in the selfers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%