Molecular Tools for Screening Biodiversity 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0019-6_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility Testing of SSRs by a Network of European Laboratories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
105
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower similarities obtained by the RAPD compared to ISSR markers were also observed by Korbin et al (2002), who reached the conclusion that six times more RAPD marker primers were necessary to reach values similar to those obtained by the ISSR markers. This fact was related to the low repeatability of the RAPD markers caused by its elevated sensitivity to experimental conditions (Jones et al, 1997), which can be considered the main limiting factor of the technique.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower similarities obtained by the RAPD compared to ISSR markers were also observed by Korbin et al (2002), who reached the conclusion that six times more RAPD marker primers were necessary to reach values similar to those obtained by the ISSR markers. This fact was related to the low repeatability of the RAPD markers caused by its elevated sensitivity to experimental conditions (Jones et al, 1997), which can be considered the main limiting factor of the technique.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of the sequence markers is their limited variation. We applied AFLP as an alternative, because AFLP generates polymorphic markers at a high frequency, has a high reproducibility, and has genome wide sampling and its markers are not under direct selection pressure (Jones et al 1997;McGregor et al 2000;Russell et al 1997).…”
Section: Aflp Markers For Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFLP is a DNAfingerprinting technique that generates large numbers of highly reproducible fragment markers with a genome-wide distribution. The technique is relatively fast and cost efficient and requires no prior knowledge of the genome (Jones et al 1997;McGregor et al 2000;Russell et al 1997;Vos et al 1995). Relative to morphological markers, AFLPs have the advantage that they are not under direct selection pressure, since most of the fragments represent noncoding parts of the genome (Vos et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the present study, microsatellite markers were chosen due to their applicability in earlier studies of hybridization (Muir et al, 2000;Beaumont et al, 2001;Coart et al, 2003), codominance, and ease of interpretation in studies of population differentiation (Balloux and Lugon-Moulin, 2002), high level of diversity, and reproducibility allowing for future comparisons of European data (Jones et al, 1997). Potentially, homoplasy can pose a problem in delineating the relationship between taxonomic units (Goldstein & Pollock, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%