Molecular Tools for Screening Biodiversity 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0019-6_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility Testing of AFLPs by a Network of European Laboratories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
125
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because one of the main problems of the traditional interspecies taxonomic research of black pine was how to supply sufficient comparative materials from the whole range (Vidakoviae 1991), and because it is not possible to exchange RAPD results among laboratories (Jones et al 1997), at the beginning of this research we tried to join two things which at the first sight seem to be incompatible: the sample from the whole range of black pine (Fig. 1) and the RAPD research restricted to just one laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because one of the main problems of the traditional interspecies taxonomic research of black pine was how to supply sufficient comparative materials from the whole range (Vidakoviae 1991), and because it is not possible to exchange RAPD results among laboratories (Jones et al 1997), at the beginning of this research we tried to join two things which at the first sight seem to be incompatible: the sample from the whole range of black pine (Fig. 1) and the RAPD research restricted to just one laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies comparing different molecular techniques have highlighted the key qualities of the AFLP technique, which are a high multiplex ratio (number of polymorphic markers generated in a single PCR experiment) and high reproducibility (Powell et al . 1996; Jones et al . 1998; Pejic et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AFLP genotyping technique was chosen because of its high multiplex ratio (number of polymorphic markers generated in a single PCR experiment), high reproducibility (Jones et al 1998, Pejic et al 1998, and because of the lack of publicly available codominant markers (nuclear RFLP, SSR or SNP) in this species. AFLP markers were therefore used to assess: (1) the genetic structure within and among varieties in the industrial chicory type; (2) the population genetic structure of C. intybus in the wild in Belgium; and (3) the genetic variation between cultivated and wild varieties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%