2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.gme.0000135247.11972.b3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of self-reported menopause age at the 24-year follow-up of a population study of women in Göteborg, Sweden

Abstract: Menopause ages reported at an interval of almost 20 years showed a significant correlation. However, a regression tendency of the values toward the mean was observed, suggesting that strong correlation at the group level does not imply precision at the extremes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…39 It may have a regression toward the mean pattern, with women initially reporting early menopause subsequently reporting an older age at menopause. 40 These previous studies of menopausal recall suggest that our findings may be biased toward the null.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…39 It may have a regression toward the mean pattern, with women initially reporting early menopause subsequently reporting an older age at menopause. 40 These previous studies of menopausal recall suggest that our findings may be biased toward the null.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Prior analyses have demonstrated generally good correlation between prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus as assessed as self-report in SHIELD when compared with the prevalence of diabetes mellitus determined by objectively measured survey such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) [10, 14]. Although accuracy and validity of the self-reported method of diagnosis and age at diagnosis were not done in this study, other studies have shown a significant correlation and validity of self-reported data over long recall periods [1517]. Age at menopause reported at an interval of almost 20 years showed significant correlation with a mean difference between first-reported and recalled menopause of 0.5 years [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although accuracy and validity of the self-reported method of diagnosis and age at diagnosis were not done in this study, other studies have shown a significant correlation and validity of self-reported data over long recall periods [1517]. Age at menopause reported at an interval of almost 20 years showed significant correlation with a mean difference between first-reported and recalled menopause of 0.5 years [15]. Breast cancer survivors accurately recalled their treatment and number of invaded nodes with kappa ≥0.85 [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…36 Inconsistency in reporting age at menopause has been associated with advancing age with older age being predictive of misremembering. 3, 4, 7 Surgical menopause (hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy) is associated with greater reproducibility of recall of age at menopause than natural menopause. 36 Chronic medical conditions are associated with poor recall of medical information, 11 but no known studies have examined the relationship between chronic medical conditions and reproducibility of self-reported age at menopause in surgical and natural menopause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16, 17 Second, our sample composition differs from samples drawn in previous studies by sociodemographic indicators of recall and health. Prior works include samples that are primarily early post-menopausal, 5, 10 white, 3, 7, 8 affluent, 4 or highly educated. 5, 9 Sample heterogeneity may allow for the generalization of findings to other samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%