2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2010.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of cutaneous thermal hyperaemia assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry in young and older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
62
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reproducibility of baseline CVC and percentage of peak CVC change were not acceptable in the present study, consistent with previous reports that showed poor reproducibility when the data were expressed as baseline CVC or a form that involved baseline Time (min) CVC, such as peak CVC change and percentage of peak CVC change (Agarwal et al, 2010;Roustit et al, 2010a,b;Tew et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reproducibility of baseline CVC and percentage of peak CVC change were not acceptable in the present study, consistent with previous reports that showed poor reproducibility when the data were expressed as baseline CVC or a form that involved baseline Time (min) CVC, such as peak CVC change and percentage of peak CVC change (Agarwal et al, 2010;Roustit et al, 2010a,b;Tew et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Within-subject coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC[2,1]) were used to test the reproducibility of the measurements of the hyperemic response (Agarwal et al, 2010;Bland, 2000;Roustit et al, 2010a,b;Tew et al, 2011). The CV values were calculated using the root mean square method and CV values of b 10%, 10-25%, and >25% represented good, moderate, and poor reproducibility, respectively (Iellamo et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among these methods, LDF is the most widespread technique for assessment of tissue perfusion. It provides quantitative estimations of relative changes in blood perfusion in response of various external impacts [5][6][7]. However, LDF probes operate in a single-point, which lead to spatial variability and poor reproducibility of results [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%