2006
DOI: 10.1007/11668855_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing NFRs and FRs: A Goal-Oriented and Use Case Driven Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have used NFRs in conjunction with a more structured requirements representation notation, e.g., the combination of NFRs with use cases or misuse cases (for example, see [23], [24], [25], [26] and [27]). …”
Section: Representations Of Non-functional Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have used NFRs in conjunction with a more structured requirements representation notation, e.g., the combination of NFRs with use cases or misuse cases (for example, see [23], [24], [25], [26] and [27]). …”
Section: Representations Of Non-functional Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine satisficeability, design alternatives or decisions (called operationalizing softgoals) are considered; design tradeoffs are analyzed, design rationale is recorded and design choices are made. The entire process is recorded in a "Softgoal Interdependency Graph" (SIG) and then the selected design decisions (operationalizing softgoals) can be used as a framework for architecture and design [8]. Figure 4 depicts a SIG for the Student Friendliness softgoal in the context of our example.…”
Section: Softgoal Interdependency Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Softgoal Interdependency Graphs (SIGs) have been intensively used in software engineering for modeling non-functional requirements as "softgoals" to be "satisfied" [7,8]. To determine satisficeability, design alternatives or decisions (called operationalizing softgoals) are considered; design tradeoffs are analyzed, design rationale is recorded and design choices are made.…”
Section: Softgoal Interdependency Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspect-oriented Pattern-based • NFR Representation multi-model [57] • Ontology based Quality modelling [58,59] • NFR use-case Model [60,61] • NFR integration Framework [62] • NFR use cases and scenarios models [8] • NFR Framework [63][64][65][66][67][68][69] • Activity-based quality model [70] • Efficiency use-cases [30] • Ontology-based NFR conceptualization [71] • NFR Traceability model [72] • QRA Framework [73,74] • NFR integration Framework [75,76] • ProcessNFL language [77] • UML Profile [78] • Quality requirements BP framework [79][80][81][82][83][84] • NoFun language [85] Several goal-oriented modelling approaches are proposed to represent the interrelations of different system development viewpoints [57], domain ontology and NFRs [58,59], functional and non-functional requirements [60][61][62], soft-goal interdependencies of NFRs [8,[63][64][65][66][67][68]…”
Section: Goal-orientedmentioning
confidence: 99%