2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition

Abstract: The visual system can only accurately represent a handful of objects at once. How do we cope with this severe capacity limitation? One possibility is to use selective attention to process only the most relevant incoming information. A complementary strategy is to represent sets of objects as a group or ensemble (e.g. represent the average size of items). Recent studies have established that the visual system computes accurate ensemble representations across a variety of feature domains and current research aim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
675
5
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(747 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
32
675
5
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean is the most sensitive to outlier presence and thus the most conservative benchmark to test for overweighting because it already gives the most weight to the outlier (see Study 1 stimuli). encode accurately and rapidly sets (ensembles) of stimuli (Alvarez, 2011;Whitney, Haberman & Sweeny, 2014). This is true of basic visual stimuli such as item size (Ariely, 2001;Chong & Treisman, 2003), orientation (Alvarez & Oliva, 2009;Dakin & Watt, 1997), speed (Watamaniuk & Duchon, 1992), and location (Alvarez & Oliva, 2008).…”
Section: Perceiving Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean is the most sensitive to outlier presence and thus the most conservative benchmark to test for overweighting because it already gives the most weight to the outlier (see Study 1 stimuli). encode accurately and rapidly sets (ensembles) of stimuli (Alvarez, 2011;Whitney, Haberman & Sweeny, 2014). This is true of basic visual stimuli such as item size (Ariely, 2001;Chong & Treisman, 2003), orientation (Alvarez & Oliva, 2009;Dakin & Watt, 1997), speed (Watamaniuk & Duchon, 1992), and location (Alvarez & Oliva, 2008).…”
Section: Perceiving Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, it is important to note two points: (i) if there are no priors regarding which rules are possible or likely to represent the output of a given system, then it may be impossible to generalize and predict its future behaviour [28,48]; (ii) although real objects deviate from abstractions (such as apples deviate from spheres), it seems that, at least in visual processing, abstract prototypes and the amount of deviation from those prototypes can be simultaneously represented in a mutually informative way [46]: the amount of deviation allowed before a shift from the initial abstraction is dependent on the suitability of the resulting behaviours [14,49]. Although recursive prototypes can be the initial priors, the representational schema may evolve owing to functional constraints.…”
Section: What Is Recursion Good For?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One theoretical consequence of the previous studies as well as the current study is that most probably representtation of information in VWM does not consist of isolated representations of objects in a memorized scene, but it also includes the pattern of their mutual relations (see Clevenger & Hummel, 2014), the overall layout (see Rensink, 2000), and general statistical properties encoded into some ensemble representation of the visual pattern (see Alvarez, 2011;. Although early research on VWM was primarily focused on uncovering VWM representation of the single visual objects, as well as their maximal number that can be simultaneously processed by humans (leading to estimates of VWM capacity of about three or four objects; see Cowan, 2001;Vogel et al, 2001), currently an increasing evidence implicates that representation of visual information in WM is highly hierarchical, encompassing the binding of elementary features into composite objects, as well as binding of objects into groups and ensembles (for a seminal model of such binding see Hummel & Biederman, 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It seems that only such hierarchical representations allow holistic and meaningful interpretation of perceptual data . Moreover, such representations more efficiently compress visual data, which often include a lot of structured organization and redundancy (Alvarez, 2011). Overall, encoding (in perception) and actively maintaining (in VWM) visual information seem to be more complex processes than they were initially considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation