Representation of Women in Academic Orthopaedic Leadership: Where Are We Now?

Abstract

Background Women have long been underrepresented in orthopaedic surgery; however, there is a lack of quantitative data on the representation of women in orthopaedic academic program leadership. Questions/purposes (1) What is the proportion of women in leadership roles in orthopaedic surgery departments and residency programs in the United States (specifically, chairs, vice chairs, program directors, assistant program directors, and subspecialty division chiefs)? (2) How do women and men leaders compare in terms of years in position in those roles, years in practice, academic rank, research productivity as represented by publications, and subspecialty breakdown? (3) Is there a difference between men and women in the chair or program director role in terms of whether they are working in that role at institutions where they attended medical school or completed their residency or fellowship? Methods We identified 161 academic orthopaedic residency programs from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) website. Data (gender, length of time in position, length of time in practice, professorship appointment, research productivity as indirectly measured via PubMed publications, and subspecialty) were collected for chairs, vice chairs, program directors, assistant program directors, and subspecialty division chiefs in July 2020 to control for changes in leadership. Information not provided by the ACGME and PubMed was found using orthopaedic program websites and the specific leader's curriculum vitae. Complete data were obtained for chairs and program directors, but there were missing data points for vice chairs, assistant program directors, and division chiefs. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS using independent t-tests for continuous variables and the Pearson chi-square test for categorical variables, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Three percent (4 of 153) of chairs, 8% (5 of 61) of vice chairs, 11% (18 of 161) of program directors, 27% (20 of 75) of assistant program directors, and 9% (45 of 514) of division chiefs were women. There were varying degrees of missing data points for vice chairs, assistant program directors, and division chiefs as not all programs reported or have those positions. Women chairs had fewer years in their position than men (2 6 1 versus 9 6 7 [95% confidence interval -9.3 to -5.9]; p < 0.001). Women vice chairs more commonly specialized in hand or tumor compared with men (40% [2 of 5] and 40% [2 of 5] versus 11% [6 of 56] and 4% [2 of 56],Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Ethical approval was not sou...

The Effect of Implicit Bias and Current Culture in Orthopaedic Surgery

“…3 The importance of role models cannot be over emphasized in the recruitment of future orthopaedic surgeons. The lack of women and minorities in the field, the scarcity of these groups in substantial leadership positions, 7 and the delayed progression through the academic ranks 8 sends a message to underrepresented groups that their opportunity to advance and succeed may be limited. In addition, the "manels" that often dominate our educational courses and society meetings add to the sense of estrangement which may discourage potential qualified applicants from applying to orthopaedics.…”

Patient Disparities and Provider Diversity in Orthopedic Surgery: A Complex Relationship

“…In July 2020, only three women filled 153 chair positions in academic orthopaedic departments. 21 Approximately one-tenth (18/161) of program directors and division chiefs (45/514) were women.…”

The phenotype of academic pathology chairs

“…There is a growing body of literature on personal characteristics and motivations of individuals becoming chairs in other medical specialties, as well as data on gender and race. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 It is well known that by virtue of its position at the cusp of basic science and clinical medicine, academic pathology departments embrace a wide range of clinical and research missions. The leadership required to steer these departments in the appropriate directions therefore must be equally diverse, encompassing basic scientists, physician scientists, and clinical practitioners bolstered by diversity in race, gender and leadership qualifications.…”