Reporting animal research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2019

Abstract

Improving the reproducibility of biomedical research is a major challenge. Transparent and accurate reporting are vital to this process; it allows readers to assess the reliability of the findings, and repeat or build upon the work of other researchers. The NC3Rs developed the ARRIVE guidelines in 2010 to help authors and journals identify the minimum information necessary to report in publications describing in vivo experiments.Despite widespread endorsement by the scientific community, the impact of the ARRIVE guidelines on the transparency of reporting in animal research publications has been limited. We have revised the ARRIVE guidelines to update them and facilitate their use in practice. The revised guidelines are published alongside this paper. This Explanation and Elaboration document was developed as part of the revision. It provides further information about each of the 21 items in ARRIVE 2019, including the rationale and supporting evidence for their inclusion in the guidelines, elaboration of details to report, and examples of good reporting from the published literature.As a new international working groupthe authors of this publication, we have revised the guidelines to update them and facilitate their uptake; the ARRIVE guidelines 2019 are published alongside this paper [13]. We have updated the recommendations in line with current best practice, reorganised the information and classified the items into two sets. The ARRIVE Essential 10 constitute the minimum reporting requirement and the Recommended Set provides further context to the study described. The two sets help authors, journal staff, editors and reviewers use the guidelines in practice, and allow a pragmatic implementation with an initial focus on the most critical issues. Once the Essential 10 are consistently reported in manuscripts, items from the Recommended Set can be added to journal requirements over time until all 21 items are routinely reported in all manuscripts. Full methodology for the revision and the allocation of items into sets is described in the accompanying publication [13].A key aspect of the revision was to develop this Explanation and Elaboration document to provide background and rationale for each of the 21 items of ARRIVE 2019. Here we present additional guidance for each item and subitem, explain the importance of reporting this information in manuscripts that describe animal research, elaborate on what to report, and provide supporting evidence. Each subitem is also illustrated with examples of good reporting from the published literature. Box 1: GlossaryBias: Introduction of a systematic error in the estimated effect of an intervention, caused by inadequacies in the design, conduct, or analysis of an experiment.Effect size: Quantitative measure that estimates the magnitude of differences between groups, or relationships between variables. Experimental unit:Biological entity subjected to an intervention independently of all other units, such that it is possible to assign any two experimental units to different t...

Acceleration of Bone Regeneration Induced by a Soft‐Callus Mimetic Material

“…The animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Central Authority for Scientific Procedures on Animals (Dutch national CCD) and of the local animal welfare body (2465‐2‐01) in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for animal experimentation. [ 32 ] The power analyses used to determine the number of samples required per group are presented in the Supporting Information. Twenty‐four male Brown Norway rats of 11 weeks old (Envigo) were randomly housed in pairs at the Central Laboratory Animal Research Facility of the Utrecht University.…”

The structural effects of Vitamin A deficiency on biological macromolecules due to ethanol consumption and withdrawal: An FTIR study with chemometrics

“…8023, revised 1978). All experiments were made to minimize suffering in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines [26].…”

Tracking the binding of multi‐functional fluorescent tags for Alzheimer's disease using quantitative multiphoton microscopy

“…All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign and in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines [26]. For the experiments with frozen brain slices, three 10 to 11‐months‐old 5xFAD (Jackson Laboratories) mice and one wildtype (WT, C57BL/6) control were sacrificed by cardiac perfusion with saline.…”