1985
DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.57.s1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report to The American Physical Society of the study group on radionuclide release from severe accidents at nuclear power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sb, Te, Mo, Sr and Pu are of intermediate importance [45]. Although Te, Mo and Pu have a small impact from the viewpoint of external exposure [27], they are important because Te and Mo are reported to form compounds with Cs, such as Cs 2 Te and Cs 2 MoO 4 [23,36], and Pu results in significant internal exposure [48].…”
Section: Priority Of Elements To Be Investigatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sb, Te, Mo, Sr and Pu are of intermediate importance [45]. Although Te, Mo and Pu have a small impact from the viewpoint of external exposure [27], they are important because Te and Mo are reported to form compounds with Cs, such as Cs 2 Te and Cs 2 MoO 4 [23,36], and Pu results in significant internal exposure [48].…”
Section: Priority Of Elements To Be Investigatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the viewpoint of public exposure, Cs and I are very important because almost all Cs and I in the fuel are released in a severe accident, which significantly impacts on the off-site exposure in the immediate and in the long term for I and Cs, respectively [26,[45][46][47]. Sb, Te, Mo, Sr and Pu are of intermediate importance [45].…”
Section: Priority Of Elements To Be Investigatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further transport of released FPs to the environment outside the pool building would be different for an SFP located inside the reactor containment than for an SFP in a non-hermetic building or non-isolated (open or failed) containment. In case the SFP is inside the reactor containment, the involved phenomena would be the same as for severe reactor accidents [54]. If the SFP is located in a non-hermetic building, the escape of FPs to the free environment would depend on the design and possible damage to the building.…”
Section: Phenomena Identification and Ranking Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently the technical community found that insufficient attention has been paid to testing PRA assumptions (27)(28)(29), including the size of the appropriate source term (30). It has also been widely agreed that PRAs are best not interpreted in terms of absolute risks (31), as suggested by the original Rasmussen study.…”
Section: The Bumpy Evolution Of Probabilistic Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%