2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10569-017-9805-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
225
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
7
225
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the same control network was used, this effort was carried out independently from the bundle adjustment described above (i.e., the mosaics were not produced using any of the updated body parameters except the improved value for W o discussed above). The resulting global shape parameters for Enceladus are given in Table with a comparison to current IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements (Archinal et al, ) recommended values, the latter of which were originally derived by Thomas et al (). We find an a , b , and c radius for Enceladus of 256.1, 251.3, and 248.4 km, respectively, where a is the tidal axis and c is the rotation axis.…”
Section: Resulting Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the same control network was used, this effort was carried out independently from the bundle adjustment described above (i.e., the mosaics were not produced using any of the updated body parameters except the improved value for W o discussed above). The resulting global shape parameters for Enceladus are given in Table with a comparison to current IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements (Archinal et al, ) recommended values, the latter of which were originally derived by Thomas et al (). We find an a , b , and c radius for Enceladus of 256.1, 251.3, and 248.4 km, respectively, where a is the tidal axis and c is the rotation axis.…”
Section: Resulting Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Note . IAU values are from the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements (Archinal et al, ). This value of W o (indicated with a *) was derived directly from the jigsaw bundle adjustment solution and is independent from our analysis of the position of Salih, which determined the prime meridian offset to be 7.089°.…”
Section: Resulting Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 by the letters A-G. Table 2 summarizes the coordinates, estimated size, and proposed names or designations for the identified topographic features. The reference zero longitude of the asteroid-centric coordinate system was defined as the location of the large equatorial depression Xanthos, following the IAU recommendation for the reference frame (Archinal et al 2018). For each epoch we also indicate whether the feature falls within the visible part of the asteroid and whether it could be identified on the series of images that corresponds to that epoch.…”
Section: Impact Cratersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that the OGC standards are also largely applicable to planetary needs and that the planetary community should continue to engage the OGC and use, to the greatest extent possible, terrestrial standards (Hare et al, ). Finally, IAU planetary coordinate standards (Archinal et al, ) should be utilized to ensure spatial interoperability. We note that many standards by fiat exist for the definition of coordinate systems and simply suggest that the IAU recommendations (which generally follow historical precedence) be followed.…”
Section: Case Study: a Europa Sdimentioning
confidence: 99%