1985
DOI: 10.1159/000132181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of the committee on chromosome rearrangements in neoplasia and on fragile sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
68
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(70 reference statements)
4
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with rare fragile sites (11q13, 12q13, 16q22) in PBL have been reported in the literature who had a breakpoint apparently coincident with a fragile site present in their cancer cells [21]. In our study, a relationship possibly existed between the most frequently observed chromosomal breakpoints and fragile sites, oncogenes, and tumor suppressor gene loci described in the literature [9][10][11] (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individuals with rare fragile sites (11q13, 12q13, 16q22) in PBL have been reported in the literature who had a breakpoint apparently coincident with a fragile site present in their cancer cells [21]. In our study, a relationship possibly existed between the most frequently observed chromosomal breakpoints and fragile sites, oncogenes, and tumor suppressor gene loci described in the literature [9][10][11] (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A majority of mapped oncogenes are located at these breakpoints and some of them are known to be activated following chromosomal rearrangements. Fragile sites have also been implicated, because they mostly involve the same bands as cancer breakpoints or those near to oncogene and tumor suppressor gene loci [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallest region of frequent allele loss contains the two markers D7S522 and D7S649 in 7q31.1-31.2, a region that also contains FRA7G (Berger et al, 1985;Barbi et al, 1984), an aphidicolin-inducible fragile site. The biological signi®cance of at least some fragile sites is that they might predispose chromosomes to breakage which would then result in translocations, deletions, or even ampli®cations that could play a role in tumor development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that time fragile sites continued as an active area of research in cytogenetics and their definition and classification was subject for several controversies with the increasing knowledge (3,4). Today FS are understood as specific loci that preferentially exhibit gaps and break on metaphase chromosomes following partial inhibition of DNA synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%