2001
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/73.1.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Workshop on Use of Adult Anthropometry for Public Health and Primary Health Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
144
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
144
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…One concern is that measurement errors could be included in a ratio and that the interpretation of these, in terms of pathophysiology is difficult. 40 Numerous studies have found a higher association to diverse risk indicators using waist circumference instead of WHR, which in addition is easier to measure. 55,41,56 However, in a number of reports evaluating the association of waist circumference or WHR to diverse cardiovascular risk factors, the latter was an equal or better predictor than waist circumference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One concern is that measurement errors could be included in a ratio and that the interpretation of these, in terms of pathophysiology is difficult. 40 Numerous studies have found a higher association to diverse risk indicators using waist circumference instead of WHR, which in addition is easier to measure. 55,41,56 However, in a number of reports evaluating the association of waist circumference or WHR to diverse cardiovascular risk factors, the latter was an equal or better predictor than waist circumference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WHR is typically used as a tool to quantify central body fat distribution and as a predictor of cardiovascular risk and metabolic syndrome. 15,39,40 The ratio was calculated by dividing waist by hip (in centimeters) circumferences. We estimated mean anthropometric characteristics by WHR tertile and calculated the prevalence of WHR greater than 0.85, a cutoff point for MCA previously described in Mexican population.…”
Section: Anthropometric Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The WHO Expert Committee on Obesity in Asian and Pacific populations suggested revised cutoff points for waist circumference: 90 cm for men and 80 cm for women for identifying persons with abdominal obesity. 5 However, these preliminary proposals were derived from limited data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the same waist circumference leads to comparable incidences of type 2 diabetes within different populations. 5 These differences are, however, relatively small. In the San Antonio Heart Study, high waist circumference predicted the development of diabetes over seven years in Mexican Americans.…”
Section: Body Mass Index and The Development Of Type 2 Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This complex term without a biological basis, and has subsequently been proven to be inferior to waist circumference alone for most purposes. 5 The waist-to-hip ratio was, however, first popularised in cross-sectional studies for the prediction of diabetes. 9,10 More detailed analysis in larger studies suggests that both high waist circumference and low hip circumference play a part in the development of type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Body Mass Index and The Development Of Type 2 Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%