Recent reports on the production of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) on the surface of condensed water microdroplets without the addition of catalysts or additives have sparked significant interest. The underlying mechanism is thought to be ultrahigh electric fields at the air−water interface; smaller droplets present larger interfacial areas and produce higher (detectable) H 2 O 2 yields. To gain insights into this phenomenon, we performed condensation experiments and quantified H 2 O 2 formation as a function of the vapor source. Specifically, we compared the H 2 O 2 concentration in water microdroplets condensed from the vapor realized via (i) heating water in the range of 50−70 °C and (ii) ultrasonic humidification (as exploited in the original report). Experimental results revealed that the H 2 O 2 level inside water microdroplets condensed via heating water was below our detection limit (≥0.25 μM), regardless of the droplet size or the substrate wettability. In contrast, water droplets condensed via ultrasonic humidification contained significantly higher (∼1 μM) H 2 O 2 concentrations. We conclude that the ultrasonic humidifiers contribute to H 2 O 2 production, not droplet interfacial effects.