Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Li & Yang's comments on “Comparing the current and early 20th century warm periods in China”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that there is considerable debate over how warm the earlier warm period is relative to the current warm period. Indeed, this debate is ongoing, e.g., see Li and Yang (2019) and our reply (Soon et al, 2019). However, hopefully this should illustrate how you need to be very careful in making these sort of generic statements, when you are referring to the IPCC!…”
Section: C4mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We showed that there is considerable debate over how warm the earlier warm period is relative to the current warm period. Indeed, this debate is ongoing, e.g., see Li and Yang (2019) and our reply (Soon et al, 2019). However, hopefully this should illustrate how you need to be very careful in making these sort of generic statements, when you are referring to the IPCC!…”
Section: C4mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this context, we provided a review of Chinese temperature trends in Soon et al (2018). You might also find the ensuing discussion, i.e., Li and Yang (2019) and Soon et al (2019) relevant.…”
Section: ) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We will show that the standard estimates used by IPCC (2013) [2], which include urban as well as rural stations, imply a much greater long-term warming than most other estimates. This suggests that the standard estimates have not adequately corrected for urbanization bias [56,[116][117][118].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%