2013
DOI: 10.1144/jgs2012-089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Discussion on ‘A high-precision U–Pb age constraint on the Rhynie Chert Konservat-Lagerstätte: time scale and other implications’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R. Soc. B 285: 20172631 have been dated to the early Pragian to early Emsian [70] and the andesite beneath the Rhynie Chert has been dated to 411 Ma [70,71], though the temporal relationship between the andesite and the chert is subject to controversy [72,73]. Here, Rhyniognatha hirsti is considered to be approximately 407 Myr in age.…”
Section: Sedimentological and Palaeontological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. Soc. B 285: 20172631 have been dated to the early Pragian to early Emsian [70] and the andesite beneath the Rhynie Chert has been dated to 411 Ma [70,71], though the temporal relationship between the andesite and the chert is subject to controversy [72,73]. Here, Rhyniognatha hirsti is considered to be approximately 407 Myr in age.…”
Section: Sedimentological and Palaeontological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiometric dating of the underlying Milton of Noth Andesite at ca. 411 Ma (Parry et al, 2013(Parry et al, , 2011 has been subject to a dispute over its temporal relationship to hot spring activity associated with the cherts (Mark et al, 2013(Mark et al, , 2011 and predates the biostratigraphic dating of the Rhynie Chert relative to the global dating of the base of the Pragian Stage. Therefore, a soft maximum constraint may be defined at 411 Ma for the Rhynie Chert.…”
Section: Age Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rhynie chert is situated about 50 km NW of Aberdeen, Scotland [10]. Radiometric ages vary from 407.6 ± 2.2 Ma [48] to 411.5 ± 1.3 Ma [49], with reported differences probably reflecting methodology, geological assumptions, and any of several potential geologic sources of error. We favor the age of 407.6 ± 2.2 Ma, because it is consistent with the chronostratic interval given by the spore assemblage biozone [50] and the corresponding numerical ages for stage boundaries in the Geologic Timescale.…”
Section: Experimental Model and Subject Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%