1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(99)00411-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Comment on “First principles determination of the bonding mechanism and adsorption energy for CO/MgO(001)”1Re. to PII nr.: S0009-2614(99)00410-8.1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47,54 The values obtained with M06-2X and M06-HF are larger than the, in principle, best computational results reported in the past 20,26,29 but in nice agreement with the very recent CI value calculated by Qin. The values are even more redshifted than those calculated with the B3LYP computational approach.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47,54 The values obtained with M06-2X and M06-HF are larger than the, in principle, best computational results reported in the past 20,26,29 but in nice agreement with the very recent CI value calculated by Qin. The values are even more redshifted than those calculated with the B3LYP computational approach.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The most popular hybrid functional is B3LYP, 40,50,51 which has 20% HF exchange and therefore removes 20% of the self-interaction error. 53͒ density functional ͑a GGA͒ and a full potential linearized augmented plane-wave ͑FLAPW͒ method were performed by Wu and Zhang 26 and corrected previous exceedingly large binding energy values obtained with the LDA approximation 24 by the same group; the new calculations yielded 2.8 kcal/mol and 6 cm −1 for the interaction energy and vibrational shift, respectively, 26 whereas the LDA functional results were 6.5 kcal/mol and 33 cm −1 , respectively. 52 Importantly, the same hybrid functional and Mg 9 O 9 cluster model was used by Xu et al, 33 and their calculated interaction energy and frequency shift were 5.5 kcal/mol and +41 cm −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our results support earlier suggestions 21,22 that the CO adsorption discussed by He et al does not take place on the perfect (001) surface of MgO, but rather at some sort of defect site. After our project had been completed, another DFT study with gradient-corrected functionals and periodic boundary conditions has been reported for CO adsorption on the MgO(001) regular site . Wu and Zhang found the binding energy of 2.8 kcal/mol in their full potential linearized augmented plane wave approach with the PBE96 functional, in qualitative agreement with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The case of CO is particularly well-documented for adsorption of the molecule on MgO(100) 18,65,66 and TiO 2 (110). ,, CO interacts much stronger with metal centers of TiO 2 (110), band gap ∼2 eV 16 and not highly ionic, than with metal centers of MgO(100). In the CO/MgO(100) system the contributions to the chemisorption bond from band−orbital mixing are very weak, ,65a but become substantial in the CO/TiO 2 (110) system. , For the interaction of NO 2 with the cations of ZnO(0001), CASTEP predicts bonding energies that are larger than those found on the cations of MgO(100), a trend that reflects variations in the strength of band−orbital mixing, as was seen for the adsorption of the sulfur-containing molecules on the oxides . In the case of alkali metal adsorption, one finds very strong bonding interactions on oxides that have a narrow band gap (<4 eV) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%