2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1020-49892007000200005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply letter utilization by secondary level specialists in a municipality in Brazil: a qualitative study

Abstract: Despite a general understanding of its importance, specialists in Camaragibe had difficulty adopting the reply letter as a form of communication at the interface between primary and secondary care levels. The reply letter can be effective in improving communication at the interface, but the broad cultural, historical, and organizational features of secondary level specialists need to be considered in order to improve reply letter utilization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show weaknesses in the transfer of clinical information across care levels in the networks analyzed due to insufficient recording of data on the part of health professionals, especially in the transfer from primary care to outpatient secondary care. This is a problem often cited in other studies, mainly carried out in the health systems of high income countries [ 17 , 56 59 ] but also in some middle and low-income countries [ 60 , 61 ], and is usually related to the lack of time for recording information [ 56 ]. In the context of this study, in addition to the lack of time, it is related to the lack of willingness to communicate between levels, especially on the part of the secondary care professionals, due to a lack of interest, awareness, appreciation and trust in the role of the primary care level in patient follow-ups [ 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show weaknesses in the transfer of clinical information across care levels in the networks analyzed due to insufficient recording of data on the part of health professionals, especially in the transfer from primary care to outpatient secondary care. This is a problem often cited in other studies, mainly carried out in the health systems of high income countries [ 17 , 56 59 ] but also in some middle and low-income countries [ 60 , 61 ], and is usually related to the lack of time for recording information [ 56 ]. In the context of this study, in addition to the lack of time, it is related to the lack of willingness to communicate between levels, especially on the part of the secondary care professionals, due to a lack of interest, awareness, appreciation and trust in the role of the primary care level in patient follow-ups [ 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst for Brazil there are some, the studies tend to be limited—with a few exceptions (Almeida et al 2010 )—to the analysis of just one type of healthcare coordination or the use of a single mechanism (Figueiredo et al 2009 ; Pinto et al 2012 ). Very few of these studies go into greater depth on the factors associated with coordination (Harris et al 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalam penelitian lain persepsi dokter spesialis atas kemampuan dokter umum menyebabkan pasien tetap dirawat di rumah sakit. 9 Pertimbangan intrapersonal merupakan komponen penting, sikap kurang simpatik seharusnya tidak ada dalam kolaborasi antar profesi. 10 Kekosongan obat yang sering terjadi di apotik dan sikap kurang kooperatif antara dokter spesialis dan apoteker mengakibatkan kendala program rujuk balik.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified