2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetitive injection method: A tool for investigation of injection zone formation and its compression in microfluidic liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3639 While a solvent gradient/reversed phase cLC system may not be highly susceptible to volume overload for the more hydrophobic solutes, the more polar solutes still can suffer from broadening due to volume overload. 36,38 Of course, which solutes in a sample fall into the “more polar” class and suffer volume overload and which do not because they fall into the “more hydrophobic” class depends on the injection volume and the particular chromatographic conditions. 36,38,40,41 Volume overload decreases the overall peak capacity and sensitivity of the method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3639 While a solvent gradient/reversed phase cLC system may not be highly susceptible to volume overload for the more hydrophobic solutes, the more polar solutes still can suffer from broadening due to volume overload. 36,38 Of course, which solutes in a sample fall into the “more polar” class and suffer volume overload and which do not because they fall into the “more hydrophobic” class depends on the injection volume and the particular chromatographic conditions. 36,38,40,41 Volume overload decreases the overall peak capacity and sensitivity of the method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,38 Of course, which solutes in a sample fall into the “more polar” class and suffer volume overload and which do not because they fall into the “more hydrophobic” class depends on the injection volume and the particular chromatographic conditions. 36,38,40,41 Volume overload decreases the overall peak capacity and sensitivity of the method. 36,38,39,42 Manipulating the gradient to avoid having solutes in the early eluting, “more polar”, class flies in the face of gradient optimization 37,4345 which attempts to use all of the peak capacity available in the specified separation time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the pressure range of integrated packed beds, the use of metal substrates has been implemented to improve device strength. Titanium microchips containing 320 μm column channels packed with sub-2 μm porous particles that have pressure limits exceeding 1,000 bar have been reported [24,25]. The columns were used to study peak focusing in gradient elution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in both device robustness [24-26] and instrument integration [33-35,39,50] are enabling technology that will be required for high efficiency on-chip chromatographic separations. For low-cost separation techniques, monolithic stationary phases in polymeric chips can be implemented [42-50] and it is possible that further advances in embossing techniques to generate pillar array columns [61] could eventually lead to disposable, one-use chromatography columns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation