2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2008.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetitive control approach towards automatic tuning of Smith predictor controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the industrial-scale application of the TES installation, high stability and reliability of the controller is required. For this reason, Smith's predictor [66][67][68][69] has been selected, as a simple and well-established solution.…”
Section: Implementation Of Annmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the industrial-scale application of the TES installation, high stability and reliability of the controller is required. For this reason, Smith's predictor [66][67][68][69] has been selected, as a simple and well-established solution.…”
Section: Implementation Of Annmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, acceleration feedback control is recommended to enhance the robust of the FSM system; however, it almost has little effect on the closed loop bandwidth but only the disturbance attenuation [9]. The Smith predictor, which is famous for its delayfree characteristic and suitable for regulating systems with an excessively long time delay, has been widely used in many systems [10][11][12][13]. The classical Smith predictor is so sensitive to plant parameter variations that a little parameter mismatch could deteriorates the stability of the control system [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alvarez et al 29 developed a repetitive controller for tubular heat exchangers with delayed resonance dynamics. Tan et al 30, 31 extended the principle of repetitive control to time‐delay systems. In 31, an additional delay was introduced to improve the performance of an iterative learning controller, and a relay feedback experiment and nonlinear least squares algorithm were employed in 30 to obtain the control parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tan et al 30, 31 extended the principle of repetitive control to time‐delay systems. In 31, an additional delay was introduced to improve the performance of an iterative learning controller, and a relay feedback experiment and nonlinear least squares algorithm were employed in 30 to obtain the control parameters. In the latest work 32, we have developed a novel continuous controller for time‐delay systems with periodic references and disturbances which is based on the repetitive control design and synthesis methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%