Abstract:There is concern in the United States about young adults falling behind financially due to the increased use of student loans and low wages. This study investigates payment delinquency as a measure of financial distress to better understand how young adults might be struggling. Personality traits are incorporated into the model to determine the extent to which behavioural factors are correlated with financial behaviors and if they predict a habit trend of payment delinquency. The 1997 National Longitudinal Sur… Show more
“…It can be understood as the chronic tendency to attach value to saving money in a consistent manner and explains such beneficial financial behaviors as an increased ability to delay gratification, less discounting of future gains and higher savings levels (Dholakia et al, 2016). The positive habit formation which is central to a strong personal savings orientation helps prevent problematic financial behaviors such as payment delinquency (Letkiewicz and Heckman, 2019), which is one of the risk factors of financial vulnerability (Hoffmann and McNair, 2019). Individuals' personal savings orientation also has a positive relationship with their expected future financial security (Ponchio et al, 2019).…”
Purpose
The purpose of the paper is to examine how psychological characteristics predict membership of and transitions between states of higher vs lower financial vulnerability – and vice versa – over time.
Design/methodology/approach
This research uses a dynamic latent class model (latent transition analysis) to explore the dynamics of consumers’ financial vulnerability over time using longitudinal data obtained by repeatedly administering a measure of financial vulnerability.
Findings
This research finds that consumers in a state of lower vulnerability are “fragile” in having a relatively high likelihood of moving to a state of higher vulnerability, whereas those in a state of higher vulnerability are “entrenched” in having a relatively low likelihood of moving to a state of lower vulnerability. This pattern of results is called the “financial vulnerability trap.” While financial self-efficacy explains state membership, the consideration of future consequences drives state transitions.
Research limitations/implications
Future research could follow consumers over a longer period and consider the role of alternative psychological characteristics besides those examined.
Practical implications
This research provides practitioners with actionable insights regarding the drivers of changes in consumers’ financial vulnerability across time, showing the value of financial self-efficacy and the consideration of future consequences when developing strategies to prevent consumers from sliding from a state of lower to higher financial vulnerability over time.
Originality/value
There is scant research on financial vulnerability. Further, prior research has not examined whether and how consumers’ psychological characteristics help explain their membership of and transitions between states of different levels of financial vulnerability over time.
“…It can be understood as the chronic tendency to attach value to saving money in a consistent manner and explains such beneficial financial behaviors as an increased ability to delay gratification, less discounting of future gains and higher savings levels (Dholakia et al, 2016). The positive habit formation which is central to a strong personal savings orientation helps prevent problematic financial behaviors such as payment delinquency (Letkiewicz and Heckman, 2019), which is one of the risk factors of financial vulnerability (Hoffmann and McNair, 2019). Individuals' personal savings orientation also has a positive relationship with their expected future financial security (Ponchio et al, 2019).…”
Purpose
The purpose of the paper is to examine how psychological characteristics predict membership of and transitions between states of higher vs lower financial vulnerability – and vice versa – over time.
Design/methodology/approach
This research uses a dynamic latent class model (latent transition analysis) to explore the dynamics of consumers’ financial vulnerability over time using longitudinal data obtained by repeatedly administering a measure of financial vulnerability.
Findings
This research finds that consumers in a state of lower vulnerability are “fragile” in having a relatively high likelihood of moving to a state of higher vulnerability, whereas those in a state of higher vulnerability are “entrenched” in having a relatively low likelihood of moving to a state of lower vulnerability. This pattern of results is called the “financial vulnerability trap.” While financial self-efficacy explains state membership, the consideration of future consequences drives state transitions.
Research limitations/implications
Future research could follow consumers over a longer period and consider the role of alternative psychological characteristics besides those examined.
Practical implications
This research provides practitioners with actionable insights regarding the drivers of changes in consumers’ financial vulnerability across time, showing the value of financial self-efficacy and the consideration of future consequences when developing strategies to prevent consumers from sliding from a state of lower to higher financial vulnerability over time.
Originality/value
There is scant research on financial vulnerability. Further, prior research has not examined whether and how consumers’ psychological characteristics help explain their membership of and transitions between states of different levels of financial vulnerability over time.
“…Among major personality factors, the one most often associated with debt is conscientiousness—or, rather, a lack of it. For example, Letkiewicz and Heckman (2018, 2019) found that more conscientious people were less likely to default on student loans; they were even less likely to take out a mortgage. Similarly, in an investigation of the relation between personality and financial well‐being, Donnelly et al.…”
Section: The Psychology Of Getting Into Debtmentioning
This paper reviews psychological studies of real-life use of credit, debt, and overindebtedness, with the aim of making policy recommendations that could reduce the damage done by debt to both individuals and society. The overall level of debt in society is heavily influenced by the level of economic inequality and social insecurity, and no psychological factor can prevent debt if excessive socioeconomic disadvantage is not addressed. Within that constraint, psychological precursors to debt problems, psychological impacts of debt, and psychological strategies to help people get out of debt can be identified. Research results in these areas are used to formulate a series of recommendations that could help mitigate debt problems.
“…All debt is not created equal. The consequences of being late or defaulting on unsecured debt like credit card loan differ significantly from those resulting from default on secured debt like home mortgage (Letkiewicz & Heckman, 2019). Defaulting on a mortgage loan can result in home foreclosure.…”
Debt is associated with higher stress and lower general health (Sweet et al., 2013). Debt stress, also referred to as financial stress / distress, is defined as a reaction to the condition of one's personal financial state (Prawitz et al., 2006). Higher levels of debt stress involve preoccupation with issues such as unpaid debt and bills or calls from debt collectors. Individuals perceive and react to their financial conditions differently. Two people with same levels of income and financial resources can have different levels of perceived financial distress (O'Neill et al., 2006). Negative financial events, also known as stressor events, contribute to perception of financial stress (Kim et al., 2003). Examples of such events include receiving overdue notices from creditors and collection agencies, insufficient funds to cover checks already written, falling behind on bills and mortgage payments and family money squabbles. Women report higher levels of debt stress than males (Dunn & Mirzaie, 2016). Given the direct association between stress and general health of an individual, it is conceivable that financial debt impacts the health of females differently than that of males. Hence, we study the impact of indebtedness on health across gender.Large number of studies have documented the relationship between debt and mental health (Bridges & Disney, 2010; Brown
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.