Repatriation as a Human Rights Approach to State Options in Dealing with Returning ISIS Foreign Terrorist Fighters

Abstract

Since the territorial defeat of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), debates and questions on what states should do (individually and or collectively) with foreign terrorist fighters (FTFs) from their countries have become more relevant yet controversial. This article critically investigates whether states of origin have an obligation to repatriate ISIS FTFs under international law as well as what options are available for such countries in dealing with returning ISIS fighters based on a human rights approach. This article also highlights that the current international legal framework is generally moving toward the repatriation of FTFs for the purpose of prosecution and rehabilitation. While states have taken diverse and controversial approaches in dealing with fighters who wish to return, the option to repatriate and fairly prosecute them in their countries of origin is seen as the most comprehensive and preferred approach, not only for the countries of origin but also for the international community as a whole in the long term.

The Use and Exposure of Hate Speech Among Students: A Discourse Analysis Study

“…Consequently, the area has seen a significant increase in hate speech. In just one week, from July 29 to August 5, the National Center for the Prevention of Hate Speech recorded 6,394 hate messages (Widagdo et al, 2021). One of the most crucial things we need to do is recognize the negative impact of hate speech on people.…”

“…These acts have, unfortunately, led to negative stereotypes and biases against certain religious minorities. The most worrisome aspect of these abuses is the lack of human rights protection, indicating a grave concern for the safety and well-being of the affected population (Widagdo et al, 2021). Moreover, previous studies have highlighted many challenges Iraq faces, including inadequate facilities, limited financial resources, restricted access to technology, and political instability.…”

Logics of care and control: governing European “returnees” from Iraq and Syria

“…While this first strand of terrorism research starts with better understanding terrorists, a second strand starts instead with the international system, highlighting the flaws and problems within the existing moral, ethical or legal frameworks (for example, Widagdo, Indrayanti, and Saraswati 2021). Such research is similarly problem-solving in orientation, and looks to set out either operational protocols or to identify underlying principles, normative frameworks and thresholds for SPRR.…”

The repatriation of returning ISIS foreign terrorist fighters: Analysis of the factors influencing Indonesia’s refusal and its implications on counterterrorism efforts

“…In order to fight back against terrorism, a deeper grasp of the terrorist group's information, plan, or actions is necessary. Widagdo et al's (2021) research about FTFs who are still in Syria and Iraq found that the repatriation and prosecution within the home state is better rather than not to let them to come back home for prosecution within conflict states. In other words, the greatest solution to this issue is to reduce the number of detainees by repatriation (Widagdo et al 2021).…”

“…Widagdo et al's (2021) research about FTFs who are still in Syria and Iraq found that the repatriation and prosecution within the home state is better rather than not to let them to come back home for prosecution within conflict states. In other words, the greatest solution to this issue is to reduce the number of detainees by repatriation (Widagdo et al 2021). Another member of the Indonesian National Commission on Human Rights, Beka Ulung Hapsara, told in an interview with VOA that the Indonesian government must take into account international human rights laws when dealing with the former IS fighters and their families.…”