“…Shah et al also illustrated in a series of 15 patients that although in-hospital mortality was only 13%, survival at 12 months remained low at 50% 7. In a recent case series, Maroto et al highlighted that excellent outcomes were achieved at 3 years follow-up (87% survival) in patients who underwent aggressive early surgical intervention with excision and composite graft replacement 5. Some studies have suggested that graft salvage may be successfully achieved with extensive mediastinal debridement, washout with antimicrobial solutions and graft coverage with a vascular tissue flap 11 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Late postoperative infections present non-specifically depending on organism virulence and may include features of endocarditis, aneurysm, fistula formation or subacute infection with systemic features 1 3 4. In those who survive reoperation, 1-year survival ranges between 50% and 87% 2 5. Causative microorganisms are mostly S. aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Streptococci and Enterococcus species 1 2 6.…”
Infections of proximal aortic vascular grafts are a catastrophic complication of aortic surgery. Despite aggressive antimicrobial and surgical intervention, mortality and reinfection rates remain significant. Here, we describe a man aged 71 years with a medical history of bioprosthetic aortic valve with aortic arch replacement (modified Bentall’s procedure), who developed a large periprosthetic abscess due to Staphylococcus aureus 7 years after his initial surgery. The patient’s preference was to avoid redo surgery, however despite high-dose intravenous flucloxacillin and oral rifampicin therapy, there was rapid progression of the abscess, necessitating urgent surgery. Notwithstanding the burden of infection, the patient underwent successful surgical excision and graft re-implantation and remains independent and well, almost 2 years postoperatively.
“…Shah et al also illustrated in a series of 15 patients that although in-hospital mortality was only 13%, survival at 12 months remained low at 50% 7. In a recent case series, Maroto et al highlighted that excellent outcomes were achieved at 3 years follow-up (87% survival) in patients who underwent aggressive early surgical intervention with excision and composite graft replacement 5. Some studies have suggested that graft salvage may be successfully achieved with extensive mediastinal debridement, washout with antimicrobial solutions and graft coverage with a vascular tissue flap 11 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Late postoperative infections present non-specifically depending on organism virulence and may include features of endocarditis, aneurysm, fistula formation or subacute infection with systemic features 1 3 4. In those who survive reoperation, 1-year survival ranges between 50% and 87% 2 5. Causative microorganisms are mostly S. aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Streptococci and Enterococcus species 1 2 6.…”
Infections of proximal aortic vascular grafts are a catastrophic complication of aortic surgery. Despite aggressive antimicrobial and surgical intervention, mortality and reinfection rates remain significant. Here, we describe a man aged 71 years with a medical history of bioprosthetic aortic valve with aortic arch replacement (modified Bentall’s procedure), who developed a large periprosthetic abscess due to Staphylococcus aureus 7 years after his initial surgery. The patient’s preference was to avoid redo surgery, however despite high-dose intravenous flucloxacillin and oral rifampicin therapy, there was rapid progression of the abscess, necessitating urgent surgery. Notwithstanding the burden of infection, the patient underwent successful surgical excision and graft re-implantation and remains independent and well, almost 2 years postoperatively.
“…Endovascular technologies are increasingly available to clinicians as options for minimally invasive approaches to complex pathologies [2][3][4][5][6]. While an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm following aortic root replacement is a rare sequela, it poses a challenge given the added morbidity and potential mortality of a reoperative sternotomy [7,8]. The Amplatzer TM Septal Occluder has been previously used in a limited fashion for percutaneous closure of aortic pseudoaneurysms in 13 cases, of whom only two had prior aortic root replacements [5,6].…”
The emergence of endovascular techniques has enabled minimally invasive options for repair and salvage of postoperative sequelae from complex aortic operations. There have been few reports of percutaneous transcatheter repair of aortic pseudoaneurysms after composite aortic root replacement with reports of only two patients with follow-up longer than two years. We report a case of a 35 year man who developed an aortic root pseudoaneurysm following a composite aortic root replacement and was successfully managed by transcatheter repair using an Amplatzer Septal Occluder without evidence of recurrence at two year follow-up.
“…It may also occur during coronary artery reimplantation in a Bentall procedure. A major indication for a reoperation following the “classic” Bentall procedure were pseudoaneurysms originating from the coronary and distal graft anastomoses . Although the modified Bentall procedure has significantly reduced the incidence of coronary artery complications, late complications may still occur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major indication for a reoperation following the "classic" Bentall procedure were pseudoaneurysms originating from the coronary and distal graft anastomoses. 3,4 Although the modified Bentall procedure has significantly reduced the incidence of coronary artery complications, 5 late complications may still occur. We present images of a right coronary artery (RCA) occlusion which occurred 10 years following a modified Bentall procedure which resulted in right ventricular dysfunction.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.