Rentabilidade Econômico-Financeira Para Implantação Da Banana Prata Anã

Rodrigues, Caroline Fabri Bittencourt; Ribeiro, Francielle; Missias, Higor; Souza, Júlia Cristina; Silva, Andrécia

doi:10.18677/agrarian_academy_2018b16

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Culture treatments increased in % due to the expectation of production from the 1st year to the 2nd year; on the other hand, irrigation costs decreased, since the highest cost occurred in the system implementation in the 1st year of cultivation (Table 3). The same behavior was described by Pacheco et al (2016), Rodrigues et al (2018) and Do Couto et al (2020). Costs with seedlings, area preparation, inputs and labor for implantation and management of the banana plantation, excluding costs related to irrigation and application of the alternative treatment, accounted for most of the effective operational cost, about 85.1% in the first year and 88.5% in the second year.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 80%

“…In a study carried out by Pacheco et al (2016) during the implementation of a banana plantation in Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, costs on inputs represented 46.23% of the EOC due to the need to purchase seedlings, plastic bags and greater use of fertilizers. Rodrigues et al (2018) evaluated the economic and financial profitability for the implementation of a 'Prata Anã' banana plantation in Ipameri, Goiás, and found that inputs represented the highest costs in the year of crop implementation, representing 74.06% of the total operation cost (TOC) for the activity.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The positive effects provided by new products on crop growth and productivity in regions characterized by water stress and low natural fertility must be economically evaluated in order to spread, or not, the use of these technologies by producers (EMBRAPA, 2018;RODRIGUES et al, 2018;PIRES, KRAUZE, 2020). The profitability of an agricultural enterprise is related to the market, product sales price, total production costs and productivity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The profitability of an agricultural enterprise is related to the market, product sales price, total production costs and productivity. Proper fertilization management can provide improvements in the vegetative and reproductive development of plants, increasing production per area and, consequently, the business profitability, provided that this increase in productivity exceeds the costs of inputs (NOMURA et al, 2019;RODRIGUES et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Economic analysis of fertilization management in ‘Prata-Anã’ Gorutuba banana plants

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Brazilian banana farming is one of the most important agricultural activities in the national scenario and can be highly productive and economically profitable for producers who invest in technology. The objective of this work was to compare the economic viability of two different fertilization managements in the cultivation system of 1st -cycle ‘Prata Anã’ Gorutuba bananas. The conventional fertilization treatment (CM), adopted by the producer (control), was compared with the alternative treatment: conventional management + 3 soil conditioners + 1 biostimulant (CM + 3SC + 1B). The four products selected for the alternative treatment were oyster shell limestone, Celtonite, Lithothamnium calcareum and Acadian. The application of the four products in the CM + 3SC + 1B treatment provided satisfactory results on crop performance, mainly due to the increase of 4.032 tons ha-1. The CM+3CS+1B alternative management was more economically viable than CM, as the total operational cost (1st + 2nd year) of the alternative management was 6.71% higher compared to the conventional management; however, the alternative treatment productivity was 28.08% higher. The cost to produce one ton of bananas was R$ 2.456,91 in the conventional treatment and R$ 2.047,07 in the alternative treatment, which represents a 16.68% reduction in the average cost, indicating the economic feasibility of this treatment.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Economic analysis of fertilization management in ‘Prata-Anã’ Gorutuba banana plants

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Para a implantação do bananal foi considerado o preparo do solo com calagem, aração e gradagem, além disso, designou-se a aplicação de cloreto de potássio na dosagem de 200 kg.ha -1 , antes da data prevista para o plantio e o NPK com a formulação 10 -10 -10, em aproximadamente 350 gramas em cada cova. Optou-se pelo plantio manual em covas a uma profundidade de 35 cm e o espaçamento de 3,0 X 3,0 m entre mudas de banana da variedade Prata-Anã, estabelecendo um estande de 1.111 plantas.ha -1 , no entanto, foram contabilizadas 1.300 mudas, conforme proposto pelos autores Rodrigues et al (2018a). A colheita foi estabelecida em média 365 dias após o plantio, comercializando os frutos in natura.…”

Section: Methodsunclassified

Rentabilidade Econômica De Produção De Banana Prata-Anã

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RENTABILIDADE ECONÔMICA DE PRODUÇÃO DE BANANA PRATA-ANÃ HIGOR RODRIGUES COSTA MISSIAS1, ANDRÉCIA CÓSMEM DA SILVA2, MATHEUS DA SILVA ARAÚJO3, LEILAINE GOMES DA ROCHA1, FÁBIO SANTOS MATOS4 1MBA em Agronegócios, Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Av. Pádua Dias, 11, cep: 13418-900, Piracicaba – SP, Brasil. higor1694@gmail.com, leilaine.rocha27@gmail.com 2Docente da Universidade Estadual de Goiás, Campus Ipameri, Vila Dona Nilza - Setor Universitário, cep: 75780-000, Ipameri – GO, Brasil. andreciacs@hotmail.com 3Doutorando em Agronomia, Departamento de Ciência do Solo, Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Av. Pádua Dias, 11, cep: 13418-900, Piracicaba – SP, Brasil. araujomatheus@usp.br 4Docente da Universidade Estadual de Goiás, Campus Ipameri, Vila Dona Nilza - Setor Universitário, cep: 75780-000, Ipameri – GO, Brasil. fabio.agronomia@hotmail.com RESUMO: Objetivou-se realizar uma análise econômica da produção de banana do cultivar prata-anã, no sudeste de Goiás. Os valores e os dados foram referentes ao período de janeiro a dezembro de 2019, para uma área de 1 hectare, em um período de cinco anos. Os custos foram organizados em Custo Operacional Efetivo (COE) e Custo Operacional Total (COT). Verificou-se a rentabilidade da cultura, a partir dos conceitos de Receita Bruta (RB) e Receita Líquida (RL), e aplicação dos indicadores econômicos: Valor Presente Líquido (VPL), Relação benefício/custo (RB/C), Payback atualizado e Taxa Interna de Retorno (TIR), além da análise de sensibilidade visando verificar o risco do projeto. O COE resultou em R$ 10.083,50 e COT R$ 11.596,03 (ano 1, implantação). Para os demais anos, o COE resultou em R$ 6.051,86, no entanto, o COT do ano 2, de R$ 7.577,49, apresentou diferença dos anos seguintes devido a variação do Funrural conforme a produção. Os indicadores econômicos resultaram em: VPL R$ 109.509,49; RB/C 4,02; TIR 276% e Payback atualizado no 2º ano. A análise de sensibilidade mostrou viabilidade da cultura em todos os cenários avaliados. Portanto, a produção de banana do cultivar prata-anã mostrou-se viável para implantação na região de estudo. Palavras-chave: Musaceae, viabilidade, indicador econômico, bananicultura. ECONOMIC PROFITABILITY OF PRODUCTION OF BANANA SILVER DWARF ABSTRACT: This study aimed to perform an economic analysis of the banana production of the cultivar prata-anã, in southeast of Goiás. The values and data were for the period from January to December 2019, for an area of 1 hectare, in a period of five years. The costs were organized into Effective Operating Cost (COE) and Total Operating Cost (TOC). It was verified the profitability of the crop, based on the concepts of Gross Revenue (RB) and Net Revenue (RL), and the application of economic indicators: Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit/Cost Ratio (RB/C), Updated Payback and Internal Rate of return (IRR), in addition to sensitivity analysis to verify project risk. The COE resulted in R$ 10,083.50 and TOC R$ 11,596.03 (year 1, implementation). For the other years, COE resulted in R$ 6,051.86, however, the TOC of year 2, of R$ 7,577.49, showed a difference in the following years due to the variation of Funrural according to production. Economic indicators resulted in the following: NPV R$ 109,509.49; RB/C 4.02; TIR 276% and Payback updated in 2nd year. Sensitivity analysis showed crop viability in all evaluated scenarios. Therefore, the banana production of the cultivar prata-dwarf proved to be viable for implantation in the study region. Keywords: Musaceae, profitability, economic indicator, cost.

show abstract

Agroeconomic viability of 'Farta Velhaco' banana plantations at increasing planting densities in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil

Salmazo

Krause

Grzebieluckas

2022

Pesq. agropec. bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this work was to evaluate the morphological characteristics, yield, fruit quality, and profitability of the 'Farta Velhaco' banana (AAB, Plantain subgroup) subjected to increasing planting densities. The treatments consisted of four planting densities – 3,333, 2,222, 1,666, and 1,333 plants per hectare, whose spacings between plants were, respectively, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 m in the planting rows, arranged in a randomized complete block design, with four replicates. The planting density of 3,333 plants per hectare (4.0x2.0x1.0 m) provided yield increases, without affecting the fruit commercial standards. Although this spacing resulted in a higher production cost (US$ 5,634.06), it provided a higher operating profit (US$ 13,444.48). Therefore, the increases in planting density of up to 3,333 plants per hectare increment crop yield, without affecting the commercial quality of the fruit. The economic profitability is higher when using 3,333 plants per hectare (4.0x2.0x1.0 m), which is the most suitable plant density, considering the main morphological characteristics, as well as yield and fruit quality, in a production cycle.

show abstract

Rentabilidade Econômico-Financeira Para Implantação Da Banana Prata Anã

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

Economic analysis of fertilization management in ‘Prata-Anã’ Gorutuba banana plants

Economic analysis of fertilization management in ‘Prata-Anã’ Gorutuba banana plants

Rentabilidade Econômica De Produção De Banana Prata-Anã

Agroeconomic viability of 'Farta Velhaco' banana plantations at increasing planting densities in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About