Renewed thinking on groundwater age

Abstract

<p>Groundwater age and mean residence times have been invoked as measures of groundwater sustainability, with the idea that old or "fossil" groundwater is non-renewable. This idea appears to come from the link between groundwater age and background recharge rates, which are also of questionable use in assessing the sustainability of groundwater withdrawals. The use of groundwater age to assess renewability is further complicated by its relationship with flow system geometry. Young groundwaters near recharge areas are not inherently more renewable than older groundwaters down gradient. Similarly, there is no reason to preferentially use groundwater from smaller aquifers, which will have smaller mean residence times than larger aquifers for the same recharge rate. In some cases, groundwater ages may provide some information where groundwater recharge rates were much higher in the past and systems are no longer being recharged. However, there are few examples where the relationship between depletion and changes in recharge over long time periods has been rigorously explored. Groundwater age measurements can provide insights into the functioning of groundwater flow systems and calibration targets for numerical models and we advocate for their continued use, but they are not a metric of sustainable development. Simple metrics to assess groundwater sustainability remain elusive and a more holistic approach is warranted to maintain water levels and environmental flows.</p>

Groundwater Age Determination- Insight into Groundwater Recharge, Flow Systems and Contamination Studies

“…Groundwater age has also been encouraged as measures of assessing groundwater quality, its sustainability, renewability, identifying flow systems and paleochannels. 13 Therefore, age dating of groundwater is of immense help in planning of the water conservation and advocating management measures in problematic areas.…”