2009
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing Root Canal Obturation Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have recommended the use of orange oil (30, 33, 34). However, although orange oil was found to be effective (30, 33), its action was slower than that of chloroform (34).…”
Section: Removal Of Gutta‐perchamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies have recommended the use of orange oil (30, 33, 34). However, although orange oil was found to be effective (30, 33), its action was slower than that of chloroform (34).…”
Section: Removal Of Gutta‐perchamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have recommended the use of orange oil (30, 33, 34). However, although orange oil was found to be effective (30, 33), its action was slower than that of chloroform (34). Halothane has also been advocated (31); it was found to dissolve gutta‐percha effectively, taking the same amount of time and resulting in canals as clean as those following the use of chloroform (31).…”
Section: Removal Of Gutta‐perchamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Elimination of these etiologies is essential to reestablish an environment conducive to repairing and healing. This implies that if nonsurgical revision is the treatment of choice then not only must these etiologic factors be removed, but also the filling material present in the root canal system must be eliminated [2, 3]. The literature is replete with studies that have discussed the techniques for removal of the causative factors for persistent periapical disease [1, 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufacturers claim that these systems, in addition to shaping and finishing the root canal, are also effective in the removal of the root filling material from root canals. Both systems have been evaluated as to their ability to remove the previous root filling materials and retained debris from canals systems, with neither system demonstrating 100% effectiveness [3, 811]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%