Removal of trace organic chemicals in onsite wastewater soil treatment units: A laboratory experiment

Teerlink, Jennifer; Martínez-Hernández, Virtudes; Higgins, Christopher; Drewes, Jörg E.

doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.024

Cited by 41 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Removal efficiencies in WGS-7 (%) Removals in studied systems (%) systems studied AZM 98.77 >90 (Berglund et al, 2014) Surface-flow constructed wetlands (Berglund et al, 2014) CAM 99.76 >88 (Ternes et al, 2007) Subsurface flow (Ternes et al, 2007) LVFX 97.71 --LCM 90.09 78 (Chen et al, 2015) Integrated constructed wetland (Chen et al, 2015) SMETH 61.80 82 (Ternes et al, 2007), 95 (Grünheid et al, 2005) Subsurface flow (Grünheid et al, 2005;Ternes et al, 2007) TRC 96.11 67.9 (Waltman et al, 2006) Constructed wetland (Waltman et al, 2006) TRM 99.29 >92 (Ternes et al, 2007) Subsurface flow (Ternes et al, 2007) ACEAM 29.72 86 (Teerlink et al, 2012) 96 (Maeng et al, 2011) Laboratory experiment for onsite wastewater soil treatment (Teerlink et al, 2012) Managed aquifer recharge (Maeng et al, (Shinohara et al, 2006) Soil column (Shinohara et al, 2006) DCF 94.08…”

Section: Compoundsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…96 (Massmann et al, 2006), (>87, >98) (Drewes et al, 2002), 71.0 (Hua et al, 2003) Constructed wetland (Massmann et al, 2006), Subsurface flow (Drewes et al, 2002), lab column (Hua et al, 2003) IPP 42.22 --KTP 99.55 97 (Matamoros et al, 2008b) Constructed wetland (Matamoros et al, 2008b) MFA 95.21 45-46 (Shinohara et al, 2006) Soil column (Shinohara et al, 2006) NPX 81.75 92 (Matamoros et al, 2008b) >99 (Drewes et al, 2002) Constructed wetland (Matamoros et al, 2008b) Subsurface flow (Drewes et al, 2002) ATL 93.15 >93 (Ternes et al, 2007) Subsurface flow (Ternes et al, 2007) DSP 97.9 --BZF 98.75 >80 (Ternes et al, 2007) Subsurface flow (Ternes et al, 2007) CFB 82.1 36, 32 (Matamoros et al, 2008b), 48.3 (Hua et al, 2003), >79 (Ternes et al, 2007) Constructed wetland (Matamoros et al, 2008b), Lab columns (Hua et al, 2003), Subsurface flow (Ternes et al, 2007) GFB 95.08 >99 (Drewes et al, 2002) Subsurface flow (Drewes et al, 2002) DEET 70.3 48 (Teerlink et al, 2012) >60 (Yoon et al, 2013) Laboratory experiment for onsite wastewater soil treatment (Teerlink et al, 2012) Aquifer recharge and recovery (Yoon et al, 2013) BP 61.45 --CAF 87.19 >88 (Ternes et al, 2007) Subsurface flow (Ternes et al, 2007) CBM -78.76 5 (Matamoros et al, 2008a) Subsurface flow (Matamoros et al, 2008a) PRM 9.25 <-5 (Drewes et al, 2002) Subsurface flow (Drewes et al, 2002…”

Section: Compoundsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of operating conditions in soil aquifer treatment on the removals of pharmaceuticals and personal care products

Echigo

Itoh

2016

Science of The Total Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) is an alternative advanced treatment for wastewater reclamation, and it has the potential to control micropollutants including pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs). However, the relationship of operating conditions in SAT and removals of micropollutants was not clear. In this study, the effects of operating conditions on the removals of PPCPs were evaluated by using lab-scale columns and plant pilot-scale reactors under different operating conditions. Firstly, weathered granite soil (WGS), standard sand (SAND) and Toyoura standard sand (TS) have different soil characteristics such as total organic carbon (TOC) and cation exchange capacity (CEC). In the columns with these packing materials, the removals of carboxylic analgesics and antilipidemics were effective regardless packing materials. The removals of antibiotics were more effective in WGS than in TS and SAND, indicating high TOC and CEC enhance the sorption in SAT. Secondly, with the extension of hydraulic retention time (HRT), the removals of sulfamethoxazole, acetaminophen, crotamiton, and antipyrine were improved in WGS columns, and adaptable biodegradation for moderately removable PPCPs was formed. Thirdly, the removal efficiencies of sulfamethoxazole and crotamiton were higher in the WGS column under vadose condition than in the WGS column under saturated condition, because of aerobic condition in WGS column under vadose condition. Though long HRT and vadose condition had positive influence on the removals of several PPCPs such as sulfamethoxazole, WGS column with an HRT of 7days under saturated condition removed most PPCPs.

show abstract

Section: Compoundsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Compoundsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of operating conditions in soil aquifer treatment on the removals of pharmaceuticals and personal care products

Echigo

Itoh

2016

Science of The Total Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Here, decentralized systems that are designed especially for storm water infiltration, as well as for wastewater on-site treatment, have become increasingly relevant for building owners and operators (e.g., Reference [8]). For example, between 20% and 25% of existing and one third of all newly built private resident buildings in the USA are equipped with decentralized systems [9,10]. Besides, various legal frameworks worldwide also address this trend towards decentralized systems (e.g., affecting infiltration and wastewater retention times, the principal suitability of closely-spaced systems is illustrated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Decentralized, Closely-Spaced Precipitation Water and Treated Wastewater Infiltration

Händel

Engelmann

Klotzsch

et al. 2018

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decentralized water management requires innovative technical solutions due to restricted operational and economic resources. In this study, a combined, decentralized infiltration system in the form of closely-spaced sub-systems for precipitation water and treated wastewater has been numerically analyzed. Flow and transport simulation shows that a closely-spaced system, by arranging the infiltration pipes closely in a longitudinal manner, is feasible under the consideration of German national guidelines for both infiltration methods. Precipitation events up to a recurrence interval of five years can be infiltrated alongside with treated wastewater of a one-family house without significant reduction of the wastewaters’ residence time. Scenario analyses highlight that harmless wastewater infiltration remains mainly undisturbed for a broad bandwidth of hydrological, subsurface, and technical conditions.

show abstract

“…Thus, mechanical methods are used at the initial stage of purification. They include settling [3], centrifuging, filtering [4], etc. Gravitational purification by settling requires significant amounts of production equipment due to the very low sedimentation rate of dispersed particles.…”

Section: R O L E N Y C Hmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research into processes of wastewater treatment at plants of meat processing industry by flotation and coagulation

Савчук

Знак

Kurylets

et al. 2017

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Among industrial enterprises, which heavily pollute the environment, the impact of food industry companies is significant. First of all, it concerns enterprises that process agricultural raw materials, especially those of cattle-breeding. These enterprises are characterized not only by high water consumption (they occupy one of the first places among other industries), but also by significant dumping of used and contaminated wastewater into the environment: water, soil, and atmosphere. Some of these enterprises, in the best case, are equipped with primitive ineffective local treatment facilities, but most plants do not have even them. Wastewater contains residues of feed, kitchen salt, detergents and disinfectants, nitrogen and phosphorus compounds, alkalis, acids, and pathogenic microflora. Composition and volume of wastewater vary very widely. It depends on the type and composition of raw materials, produce range, seasonal fluctuations in production power, which are typical for most food industry enterprises, in particular meat processing. In addition, qualitative and quantitative indicators of wastewater are influenced by the composition of detergents and

show abstract

Removal of trace organic chemicals in onsite wastewater soil treatment units: A laboratory experiment

Cited by 41 publications

References 42 publications

Effect of operating conditions in soil aquifer treatment on the removals of pharmaceuticals and personal care products

Effect of operating conditions in soil aquifer treatment on the removals of pharmaceuticals and personal care products

Evaluation of Decentralized, Closely-Spaced Precipitation Water and Treated Wastewater Infiltration

Research into processes of wastewater treatment at plants of meat processing industry by flotation and coagulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About