2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(03)00285-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of organic polyelectrolytes and their metal complexes by adsorption onto xonotlite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Contrary to humic acids, fulvic acids do not coagulate even under low pH values, increasing the difficulty of their removal from aqueous medium. The lesser extent of fulvic acids sorption in comparison to humic acids has been reported for tobermorite, 5 xonotlite, 9 and vermiculite. 12 Development of new materials for this purpose requires evaluation of kinetic and thermodynamic sorption parameters, involving batch experiments in which known amounts of NOM are placed in contact with the sorbent by selected time intervals, followed by phase separation and quantification of the sorbate in the aqueous solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Contrary to humic acids, fulvic acids do not coagulate even under low pH values, increasing the difficulty of their removal from aqueous medium. The lesser extent of fulvic acids sorption in comparison to humic acids has been reported for tobermorite, 5 xonotlite, 9 and vermiculite. 12 Development of new materials for this purpose requires evaluation of kinetic and thermodynamic sorption parameters, involving batch experiments in which known amounts of NOM are placed in contact with the sorbent by selected time intervals, followed by phase separation and quantification of the sorbate in the aqueous solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[1][2][3] Besides to adsorption onto activated carbon, sorption onto clay minerals is among the main processes that have been studied aiming the removal of NOM from aqueous medium. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Humic and Fulvic acid (HA and FA) are the major components of NOM, but HA is more easily removed from waters. This fact has been explained by the intrinsic characteristics of humic substances such as the higher molar volume of humic acids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that the adsorption of humic substances increases with decreasing pH [11,33]. Only in a few cases [8,17], at very low pH, the adsorption capacity decreases again as a result of repulsion forces between the positively charged surface and positively charged HA molecule. In our work, the surface charge of carbon SA/N/CaFe is positive in the whole pH range studied (below 12.2) whereas for SA/N/CaFe dem carbon the charge of surface changes.…”
Section: Effect Of Phmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Study on the adsorption of HAs and other dissolved organic material has shown that not only the molecular size and chemical characteristic of macromolecules but also the pH and ionic strength of solution and the porous texture of adsorbent have an influence on the extent of their removal [12,[14][15][16]. Most studies on the adsorption of HAs have been focused on the removal of humic acids extracted from soil [4,15,17] and river sediments [15,18,33], and commercial Aldrich humic acid [9][10][11]. To our knowledge there is no report dealing with the adsorption by activated carbon of humic acids that were isolated from lignite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results indicated that the removal of the reactive dye on HT is a complex process that involves film diffusion, pore diffusion and reaction. Katsumata et al (2003) conducted a study to evaluate adsorption of organic polyelectrolytes (humic and fulvic acids) and their metal complexes by xonotlite. It was found that 80% of humic and 30% of fulvic acid was removed from water by xonotlite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%