2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of lignite-derived humic acids on coal-based mesoporous activated carbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(61 reference statements)
4
65
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…At all the pH values they employed, the HA loadings for the microporous carbons did not exceed 20 mg/g, whereas the mesoporous carbon achieved a maximum loading of 100 mg/g. Similar results were obtained by Lorenc-Grabowska and Gryglewicz [58], who studied the adsorption of HAs on coal-based mesoporous ACs. They found that as mesoporosity increased, so did the percentage removal of HAs.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Humic Acidsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…At all the pH values they employed, the HA loadings for the microporous carbons did not exceed 20 mg/g, whereas the mesoporous carbon achieved a maximum loading of 100 mg/g. Similar results were obtained by Lorenc-Grabowska and Gryglewicz [58], who studied the adsorption of HAs on coal-based mesoporous ACs. They found that as mesoporosity increased, so did the percentage removal of HAs.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Humic Acidsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…They have been employed over the last few decades in a wide number of applications on an industrial scale, including technologies for the purification of gases, the removal of organic pollutants from water, as a catalyst or a catalyst support in catalytic processes, and as electrode materials in electrochemical devices and processes. The application of activated carbon in adsorption processes mainly depends on the surface chemistry and pore structure of porous carbons (Bhatnagar et al 2013;Lorenc-Grabowska and Gryglewicz 2005;Frackowiak and Beguin 2001;Gryglewicz et al 2005;Santiago et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) and Freundlich (Eq. 3) models give the best fit [36][37][38][39][40][41][42], hence in this work only the two models were used to interpret the data. where q e is the equilibrium dye concentration on the adsorbent (mg g −1 ), c e is the equilibrium dye concentration in solution (mg dm −3 ), q max is the monolayer capacity of the adsorbent (mg g −1 ), and b is the Langmuir adsorption constant (dm 3 mg −1 ).…”
Section: Removal Of Phenol and Congo Redmentioning
confidence: 99%