2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of iron ions from industrial copper raffinate and electrowinning electrolyte solutions by chemical precipitation and ion exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical precipitation method is used to treat the wastewater effluent because it is affordable and handy to operate [119,120] . It includes sulphide precipitation and hydroxide precipitation.…”
Section: Remediation Techniques For Heavy Metal Removal From Textile Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical precipitation method is used to treat the wastewater effluent because it is affordable and handy to operate [119,120] . It includes sulphide precipitation and hydroxide precipitation.…”
Section: Remediation Techniques For Heavy Metal Removal From Textile Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, an ion exchange resin is considered as the effective metal ion removal from water and industrial wastewater sources [29]. The ion exchange resins are insoluble species in organic and aqueous solution, bearing charged functional group carrying mobile ion by covalent interaction and cross-linked polymer matrix structure [30], which provides the more surface area to enhance the removal efficiency [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the previous literature, metals are immobilized in jarosite by a series of precipitation, co-precipitation and adsorption reactions (Eftekhari et al, 2020) Izadi et al (2017 investigated the removal of iron by chemical precipitation and reported that the iron removal efficiency was greater with jarosite precipitation (∼70%) compared to hydroxide (∼20%). Compared to the studies of Izadi et al (2017), this study showed that iron removal by raffinate solution with the combined effects of biosynthetic jarosite seeds and A. ferrooxidans is much more efficient (∼72%) than the chemical precipitation method. Florence et al (2016) inspected the iron removal from acid mine drainage using Fe-oxidizing Ferrovum myxofaciens and reported that the average iron removal rate is 67%.…”
Section: Effects Of Jarosite Seed and A Ferrooxidans On Iron Removal Of Raffinate Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigates showed cations like nickel, zinc, copper, cobalt, can be incorporated into jarosite crystals; therefore, some copper ions in solution could precipitate with iron but would be less than co-precipitation that happens with hydroxide precipitation (Dutrizac and Monhemius, 1986;Izadi et al, 2017). This method has some advantages like simplicity, low-cost operation, and protection of equilibrium between sulfuric acid and alkali ions (Gan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation