2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)01215-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of heavy metals in industrial wastewaters by ion-exchanger grafted textiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the important adsorption mechanisms is that metal ions interact with the surfaces of adsorbent through complexation or ion exchange (Chandra et al 2010;Lacour et al 2001). According to the literature (Deng et al 2003), the adsorbents with carboxylate, sulfonic, and phosphoric groups on the surfaces favor metal ion adsorption through the ion exchange mechanism, while those containing amine groups on the surfaces adsorb metal ions through the complexation and chelation mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the important adsorption mechanisms is that metal ions interact with the surfaces of adsorbent through complexation or ion exchange (Chandra et al 2010;Lacour et al 2001). According to the literature (Deng et al 2003), the adsorbents with carboxylate, sulfonic, and phosphoric groups on the surfaces favor metal ion adsorption through the ion exchange mechanism, while those containing amine groups on the surfaces adsorb metal ions through the complexation and chelation mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-ion-exchange and complexation properties obtained by grafting various exchange functions onto a natural, artificial or synthetic matrix; -micrometer filtration properties (cutoff value: 0.1-5 mm); -ultra-fast exchange kinetics due to their high specific surface area and no reticulation; -reduction of regenerating solution consumption; -a variety of forms allowing many possibilities for their use (Lacour et al 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be concluded that by increasing the adsorbent dose the removal efficiency increases but ion-exchange density decreases. The decrease in ion-exchange density can be attributed to the fact that some of the ion exchange remains unsaturated during the sorption process; whereas the number of available ion-exchange sites increases by an increase in sorbent and this results in an increase in removal efficiency (Lacour et al, 2001). As expected, the equilibrium concentration decreases with increasing adsorbent doses for a given initial Cr (VI) concentration due to increase of surface area or ion-exchange sites for a fixed initial solute con cen tration (Cortina et al, 1996;Namasivayam and Yamuna, 1999;Pradhan et al, 1999;Yu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%