2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by complexation with DNA and precipitation with cationic surfactant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, fluorescence-based techniques are the most promising and the most widely used for the detection of Hg­(II) ions, owing to their outstanding naked eye visualization capability, portability, high selectivity, sensitivity, and easy implementation. However, although fluorescence-based analytical techniques relying on traditional chemosensors have been employed for the quantitative detection of Hg­(II) ions, they have not been used to separate these ions from the aqueous medium they contaminate. Thus far, various separation techniques, such as membrane filtration, complexation and precipitation, adsorption, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange, have been exploited. Among them, because of its low cost and high efficacy, the complexation and precipitation technique is the simplest and most promising approach to the removal of low-concentration toxic heavy metal ions. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, fluorescence-based techniques are the most promising and the most widely used for the detection of Hg­(II) ions, owing to their outstanding naked eye visualization capability, portability, high selectivity, sensitivity, and easy implementation. However, although fluorescence-based analytical techniques relying on traditional chemosensors have been employed for the quantitative detection of Hg­(II) ions, they have not been used to separate these ions from the aqueous medium they contaminate. Thus far, various separation techniques, such as membrane filtration, complexation and precipitation, adsorption, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange, have been exploited. Among them, because of its low cost and high efficacy, the complexation and precipitation technique is the simplest and most promising approach to the removal of low-concentration toxic heavy metal ions. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, glass-bead-immobilized DNA has been reported to be effective for the removal of dioxin and polychlorinated biphenyl derivatives [4][5][6][7]. Other studies have demonstrated the DNAassisted removal of heavy metal ions by precipitation of DNA complexes [8,9], removal of toxic aromatic organic compounds from wastewater through ultra-filtration and adsorption [10,11] as well as from contaminated soil through washing with DNA solutions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their presence in natural systems causes harmful effects to the living organisms (Xuejiang et al 2006). Owing to the acute toxicity associated with them, different techniques including precipitation (Sakai et al 2009), ion exchange (Dizgea et al 2009), solvent extraction (Li et al 2008), electrochemical precipitation (Janin et al 2009), and adsorption (Aguado et al 2009) have been used for their removal. Among all these methods, adsorption has been proved to be the most promising technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%